The first crow movie was fucking awful. People only like it because of nostalgia.
^nah. That scene where he kills the guy in the car and burns his symbol in the pavement is epic
http://www.bamkapow.com/ul/4354-The-Crow-symbol.jpg
Imokaywiththis.jpeg
^so fucking sick. I love it
that music during that scene is epic also
The Crow is like Highlander to me.
Everything after the first is an abomination.
FIRE IT UP FIRE IT UP
There ain't no coming back. This is the really real world, there ain't no coming back.
http://geektyrant.com/news/2011/4/12...ow-remake.htmlhttp://geektyrant.com/storage/post-i...1/Cooper6.jpeg
It was recently reported that 28 Weeks Later director Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, was set to develop the remake of The Crow. Fans of the original film are already upset that the movie is getting the reboot, and I imagine this next bit of news is going to enrage some of the fans.
Bradely Cooper (The Hangover) is currently in early negotiations to take on the lead role in the film being produced by Relativity Media. Personally, I don't see Cooper in the role of The Crow at all. For those of you who don't know Cooper will play a rock musician who is murdered while trying to save his fiancée from thugs. He is resurrected by supernatural forces and seeks revenge. Brandon Lee originally played the character but was killed on the set in a freak accident in 1993.
According to THR Fresnadillo and Cooper recently met in spain "where the two hit it off and shared a vision for the character and the film." So it looks like everyone involved will end up sealing the deal.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hea...er+-+Movies%29
well the asshole has the hair for it.
lol but when ever i see him its either "Cheesy comedy or romantic comedy". I don't think iv seen him in anything "dark".
Idk about this anymore
I haven't seen it yet myself, but I've heard he's pretty damn good in Limitless, which was a departure from his standard comedy roles.
Lately he has been seeking more "serious" roles. I think he had strong hopes to be Superman before this.
I still picture him as the guy from wedding crashers
kinda like with kevin spacy i always think of seven
Knight's Tale was pretty good, Heath did a great job in that movie.
Bradely Cooper is a horrible actor IMO. His roles should be limited to The Hangover and however many remakes they're gonna end up milking out of it.
http://geektyrant.com/news/2011/4/20...e-crow-re.htmlhttp://geektyrant.com/storage/post-i...relativity.jpg
It looks as though there is a major roadblock in the way of Relativity Media's planned reboot of The Crow to be directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo (28 Weeks Later). Earlier we reported that Bradley Cooper was in talks to play the lead role. The roadblock comes in the form of a lawsuit from The Weinstein Company against Relativity.
According to Deadline, the Weinstein's are being repped by Bert Fields, who is seeking injunctive relief and claiming there's "a written contract signed by everybody" which gives them exclusive worldwide distribution rights on the reboot. Of course, Relativity's Ryan Kavanaugh disagrees and plans to sell rights to the film to another studio. Negotiations have failed forcing the case to be heard in front of a judge. Here is what Fields had to say about the situation:
The Crow is scheduled to shoot in the fall, but that is only if an agreement can be made between the studios. The report from Deadline only tells the side of the Weinstein's, we'll report if and when more news is available for Relativity."He made a bunch of threats. Some people may submit to that kind of arrogant conduct, but we're not going to do it. If anybody tries to buy these distribution rights in The Crow, they are buying nothing but a lawsuit and they will get sued."
Update: Here is a little bit about Relativity's side of the story. Deadline has posted a letter from Relativity's Chicago-based attorney Carol Genis in response to the injunction that Bert Fields sent on behalf of The Weinstein's.
Dear Mr. Fields:
As we have informed you, the project for which you are demanding representations from Relativity is not even in production. Relativity has no obligation whatsoever to produce or distribute The Crow, and certainly has no obligation to assure TWC of anything. Relativity will waste no further time engaging in a hypothetical dialogue with you about a potential dispute that may or may not arise in the future.
In addition to being premature, your letter smacks of delusion as it ignores TWCs multiple breaches of the parties March 25, 2009 agreement (Termination Agreement). TWC openly and undisputedly failed to meet its financial obligations relating to Nine and failed to meet the contractual minimum marketing spend and contractual minimum screens for that film. As TWC is well aware, its wrongful conduct led to serious financial and other damage to Relativity. On top of such breaches, your client has failed to make payments due to Relativity and to provide the required accounting statements. It takes gall for your client to make demands upon Relativity about The Crow, which has not even been greenlit, when TWCs failure to properly distribute Nine demonstrated that it will disregard and breach any and all of its distribution, marketing and financial obligations. If any party is entitled to seek legal remedies it is Relativity.
Further, your continued bluster about filing a lawsuit in an effort to force Relativity to distribute a nonexistent film through TWC is not only absurd, it is a blatant threat to breach the dispute resolution provision of the Termination Agreement. The Termination Agreement does not permit claims for injunctive relief to be brought in court. To the contrary, the Termination Agreement provides that [a]ny and all controversies, claims or disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be resolved exclusively in one or more confidential arbitration proceedings in accordance with the procedures set forth in the NDA. (§ 15 (emphasis added).) The arbitration procedures in the NDA are found at Section 5.2, which sets forth the arbitration forum, rules, and appeal process. Your erroneous claim that TWC can bring a lawsuit arising out of the Termination Agreement is presumably based upon a misapplication of Section 5.1 of the NDA, which permits claims for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged breach of [the NDA] to be brought in court. As you know, the NDA has been terminated and TWC does not and cannot claim that Relativity is breaching or will breach the NDA. There is no good faith reading of these agreements which would permit TWC to file a lawsuit in court for a dispute arising under the Termination Agreement. As such, any claim brought by TWC in court will immediately be met with a motion for dismissal and sanctions. Your client is forewarned and proceeds at its own peril.
Nothing in this letter is intended to waive any rights or claims Relativity may have against TWC, and Relativity expressly reserves all such rights and claims.
Regards,
Carol Genis
http://www.deadline.com/2011/04/excl...e-crow-remake/