Originally Posted by
Motenten
I'm not really sure what this is supposed to mean. The tentative assertion was that DA was being checked before OAx, and that OAx itself had it's own distribution spread for however many hits were applicable. DA overriding triples on Ridill would be exactly what you would expect in such a system, so presenting it as some sort of indication that the assertion is wrong doesn't really make any sense.
Granted the assertion doesn't have a lot of evidence at this point, but that's the point in asking for further testing (as you did in the next post). Two 2500-round tests, one without any DA and one with 20% DA, should get us something that we could be reasonably certain of (2% margin of error should keep the 3-hit rounds from overlapping). Of course that's 12 hours of testing, so... yeah.