General WWE Discussion (RAW fixed WM: Dolph has the title!)

[noblemountain]

I was SURE a thumb to the eye/arm to the balls was coming... I was disappointed.

the wwe wouldn't let him do more because of his health problems, apparently they are worse than he has been letting on.

[Melena]

So rumors on the dirt sheets say Fandango will never debut. If that's the case, thank god. I was legitly feeling embarrassed every time his promo came on.

[Clemz]

They're gonna pull a reverse Brodus on us, Johnny Curtis is gonna come out and walk through everyone and win a major title before the end of the year.

[Yugl]

So rumors on the dirt sheets say Fandango will never debut. If that's the case, thank god. I was legitly feeling embarrassed every time his promo came on.

Seriously, wtf was with that guy anyways.

[Melena]

No clue. All I know is Monday I'm kicking the wife off the TV so I can watch Raw. Have a good feeling they will do some sort of tribute to Paul Bearer. Hoping it's something along the lines of Kane and Taker carrying the Urn to the ring, leaving it in the middle, kneel in front of it then walk off, no words spoken. I will probably shed a manly tear if that happens.

[Tyrath]

Could always make him a late inductee to the Hall of Fame.

[Zealot]

One of his requests was that when and if he was ever inducted, he wanted it to be the same year the Undertaker went in. So probably next year.

[Melena]

The only one I can see inducting them in now would be Glenn Jacobs (Kane). Maybe possibly Steve Austin due to the Corporate Ministry feud, but no others I think would be suitable.

[Tyrath]

Definitely has to be Kane. Before I could say Bearer and Taker could induct each other but obviously thats not possible anymore.

[Zealot]

Could an inductee also be an inductor? Because only Undertaker should induct Paul, but someone like Foley, Shawn Michaels, or Kane should induct Undertaker.

[Clemz]

I don't see why not. But definitely Taker should be inducting Paul, and I'd agree with Kane inducting Taker. Shawn Michaels could work, Foley too, but I'd think Kane would be the best choice.

[Zealot]

Tribute video from WWE:

[NynJa]

Thing is, taker showing up to something like that is out of character. WWE used to refuse interviews with taker to the media n shit.

Of course they can always switch shit around to meet their needs

[Trichocyst]

That was a really nice video with some oddly cheery, awful, music.

[Lucavi]

^ That's just the modern music of the day, man. If its not dubstep, teeny pop, or moronic auto-tuned Chris Brown, its this tripe.

Still, fucking Paul Bearer. R.I.P. Amazing memories growing up.

[Trigun]

/wooo/ just showed me VICE has channels for other countries.

[Exoduso]

So shield attacked Show after RAW went off the air... guess we're getting another 6-man tag match.
As long as Orton turns heel I'll be happy.

[Tyrath]

Didn't we talk about this just earlier in the thread? lol

Im still hopeful Orton turns at WM but I've been hearing things he might not until after.

[Exoduso]

Didn't we talk about this just earlier in the thread? lol

Im still hopeful Orton turns at WM but I've been hearing things he might not until after.

We did, but I just realized that they also attacked Show back after he knocked out Reigns last week... so NOW my issue of legitimacy of Show joining Orton/Sheamus has been thrown out the window. I really didn't want it to go this way, but oh well. I still feel they're not using these guys right, Reigns/Rollins/Ambrose are tremendous talent, I wish they'd start competing on a regular basis in singles/tag matches also.

[Tyrath]

Err...thats what I mean. We talked about them attacking show after Raw a couple pages back