Well you only really need like 1/2 an inch. It's all dependent on aim. This guy had a box-cutter and that first triangle is usually enough to get a good nick to an artery.
Posted this before but this is where it all comes from. In hand-to-hand combat, 9 times out of 10 you're not going to have a weapon when you're attacked and 10 out of 10 spontaneous knife encounters you're fucked from first snick. Just gotta be faster than the other guy and rely on your training to save yourself. All that training is based off this chart and shows where to protect yourself.
![]()
I wanna say (and certainly hope) that post was sarcasm...
I'm confused as to how the interwebs seems to think that this stands best as evidence against the gun control arguments, or am I missing something?
Mostly sarcasm mode. I am pro-gun but I know some will try to spin this in some retarded way. Posted the same on Facebook but have yet to get any bites.
I'm disappointed no one pointed out (see, I did it again) the intended pun I used with "get the point."
ur tits look hella gross and you are an retard
lol
Also, 0 kills
I could swear we had a similar news not too long ago.
you need a 1/2" if you're aiming precise strikes against a dumb opponent, and even then the most likely spots don't result in death if they can apply pressure to the wound. slashing strikes (most likely) are not going to kill you, and stab wounds (most likely in the stomach) are not going to kill you either. ive used a knife a total of 3 times and 2 of them were to cut my safety line because they are just not that reliable when someone is fighting back (and my knife is actually designed to kill people)
oblig.
People truly are losing their minds.
for people that actually give a shit about the news, it was apparently an xacto knife and at least a couple people were stabbed in the neck