Canada - The Conservative Senate Expense Scandal

[Mazmaz]

This has been going on for several weeks now and a lot of people are saying is a big enough scandal to prompt calls of resignation for the Prime Minister.

TL;DR: a number of Conservative senators (which are appointed by the Prime Minister) have claimed false expenses for their living conditions and expenses, the most notable being Mike Duffy who claimed up to $90,000 of taxpayer money. Once these false expenses were revealed through the media, the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff, Nigel Wright, opted to give Mike Duffy the $90k to pay back his expenses in return for not talking to the media. The RCMP is now investigating the entire matter for fraud and breach of trust. It was repeated by Prime Minister and the Conservatives that Nigel Wright acted alone, resigned due to his actions, and it was his personal money. The RCMP now discover documents that original the Conservative Party considered paying Mike Duffy to pay back his expenses, that several people in Prime Minister's office knew about Nigel Wright's arrangements, and that other Conservative senators tried to scale down the harshness of a report on Mike Duffy because he was paying back the money.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/stor...documents.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/interactives/senate-expense-who/

Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say

Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer.

New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims.

RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from Wright.

Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over the matter once it was reported in the media in May.

The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with the money.

The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not friends.

But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein.

When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility for a Senate seat would be at risk.

Some PMO staff knew

Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday.

Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a personal cheque to pay the government.

Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to himself until May 15.

But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin.

Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO and is employed by the University of British Columbia.

Conditions attached

Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues management in the PMO.

The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator.

It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him.

This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be breach of trust.

The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions.

Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment.

Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen, Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay for Duffy.

"This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the offer and found out about it on May 15.

CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses.

NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is just not true."

"It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he said.

Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news about Wright's payment broke.

"There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right thing and tell the truth," he said.

Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head hung in shame."

"I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers' money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he told reporters at an event.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that Harper has not been transparent with Canadians.

"It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters.

[Tajin]

Canada becomes Mexico. And nothing of value was lost. Moving on.

[mightyg]

You Canadians just don't do drama like we Americans do. That's why all your good actors and comedians bail on you. I suggest adding more sex, lies, and mysterious deaths next time.

[Pirian]

You Canadians just don't do drama like we Americans do. That's why all your good actors and comedians bail on you. I suggest adding more sex, lies, and mysterious deaths next time.

Mayor of Toronto? Or governor, or whatever he is

[Mazmaz]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/stor...ns-raised.html

8 things revealed by RCMP's court filings on Mike Duffy

New information revealed in documents filed by the RCMP about Senator Mike Duffy’s expenses raises new questions.

They range from how Duffy approached the question of his residency from the moment he was first appointed to the Senate to how much the Prime Minister's Office knew about a $90,000 bank draft to repay his inappropriately claimed expenses.

The court documents contain allegations that have not been proven in court.

Here's a look at the new information and the questions it raises.

1. The documents reveal the RCMP is investigating Duffy over not just one, but three separate fraud allegations:

For expenses perhaps fraudulently claimed for Ottawa housing and per diem costs, because Duffy said his primary residence was in P.E.I.
For possible fraudulent per diem claims submitted while he was vacationing in Florida or while he was campaigning for the Conservative Party in the last federal election.
For accepting, perhaps fraudulently, a payment from Nigel Wright, the prime minister's top aide, in exchange for a deal that would allow him to pay back his inappropriately claimed expenses quickly and without protest and for a promise a Senate report would "go easy on him."

2. Amid opposition party demands for an investigation, the RCMP, of its own volition, began investigating Duffy in March. That was two months before a Deloitte audit of Duffy's residency, commissioned by the Senate, was made public, and before a Senate committee voted to refer Duffy's expenses to the RCMP.

3. Although Duffy claimed his primary residence was in P.E.I., the documents reveal he's lived in Ottawa since 1971. However, he applied for a P.E.I. driver's licence on Dec. 22, 2008 — the same day it was announced he had been selected for appointment to the Senate.

4. In passport applications in 2007 and 2012, Duffy gave his Ottawa address as his permanent residence.

5. The documents reveal the Conservative Party initially believed Duffy owed only $32,000, an amount the party was apparently willing to pay. This amount may refer to the $34,000 the Deloitte report calculated Duffy had claimed in housing costs in Ottawa and per diems during the 18-month period of Deloitte's examination.

It is not clear why the party didn't know that Senator David Tkachuk, at the time chair of the Senate committee on internal economy, had written Duffy on Feb. 27 telling him he actually owed $90,172.

6. Lawyers for Nigel Wright, the prime minister's former chief of staff, told the RCMP that when Wright gave Duffy $90,000 he didn't know about any fraudulent claims on Duffy's part. But Wright was in contact with Senator Tkachuk during the time Deloitte was preparing its report, and it was Deloitte that discovered Duffy had claimed per diems for being on Senate business while on vacation in Florida.

7. It is not clear why the chair of the Conservative Fund, Senator Irving Gerstein, thought it was OK for the party to bear the cost of $32,000 for Duffy, but not $90,000.

8. Wright, in a statement given when he resigned, said he accepted "sole responsibility" for the decision to give money to Duffy. But the documents reveal that Wright's lawyers told the RCMP that three other senior people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the $90,000 cheque, as did Gerstein.

[Coren]

Wait, Canada's huge political fraud case thing is over 90k? Here in 'Merrca we ignore it if it's not at least in the millions.

[Mazmaz]

I know. Systems of accountability feelsgoodman

[Uzor]

Wait, Canada's huge political fraud case thing is over 90k? Here in 'Merrca we ignore it if it's not at least in the millions.

In Sweden, we had something called "The Toblerone Affair", which was about a politician buying a Toblerone for $1 with taxpayer money. Well, that's how it was first revealed, she had borrowed $2000 from taxpayer money (which she actually mostly had payed back). It made front page news and pretty much ruined her political career. Last election (which was like 13 years after it happened) her political party scored some of the lowest numbers they ever had, since she was their leader in said election. She subsequently resigned.

[archibaldcrane]

God that's the most adorable Swedish thing I've ever heard.

[Mazmaz]

What a fucking joke.

Nigel Wright won't face charges over $90K payment to Mike Duffy

[BaneTheBrawler]

so do something about it mr. dance dance revolutionary

[archibaldcrane]

If this won't make people take up hockey sticks against their moose-riding beaver overlords, what will?

[Kohan]

so do something about it mr. dance dance revolutionary

He clearly isn't chaining himself to enough trees.

[Meresgi]

How much bacon and syrup can $90k get you?


Also why are you posting this and not currently rallying your Canadian brothers to march on the PM's home and oust him to the streets for the lynching? Obviously you don't care.

[Athas]

What a fucking joke.

Nigel Wright won't face charges over $90K payment to Mike Duffy

I mean, you were really surprised? Granted I can't claim to know much of Canadian politics but I assumed it was similar enough to the US and well, most places, to see this coming.

[Ksandra]