Originally Posted by
Kaixin
OK, sorry, I didn't mean it that way. I meant more the following:
1) So far no one has proved anything conclusively
2) therefore it might be that there is no significant difference between the two classes's DPS
"math", aka back of the envelope models with assumptions out the wazoo since we don't even know the actual equations running under the hood. Assuming X,Y, and Z, we get that a PLD OT will do 145.4 more potency per GCD than a WAR OT. is that a big difference? is that a small difference? what does that even mean? what happens when you add in X, Y, and Z?
one-off trials that people have done with different amounts of strength, different weapons, different crits, different times. Sometimes the warrior did better. Sometimes the paladin did better.