No Unfinished though.
i feel for sch and smn. im sure their retinas are just shot.
I actually like my Omnilex Nexus. What I don't really like is the black skin, I'd rather have the original back but I'm assuming it'll change again before we reach the end of the questline. Or at the very end when it's supposed to become a different thing.
JPs are saying each books is 300 soldiery only
so if you have 2000 + 500? saved up for 2.4 you can basically do 8 books non stop
tbh i am expecting 500
http://i.imgur.com/pav8NNJ.jpg
i missing my zenith and atma stages, but i cant find the screen shots.
Finished my sword, almost have enough Alexandrite for my shield but I want to buy the materia now before the rush of NIN Novuses (Novi?) spike materia prices even higher than they already are. How many of each tier does the Shield take, does anyone know?
Divide by 4, add remainders to higher tiers.
22 total cap.
13 core-secondary cap: 3/3/3/4
9 det: 2/2/2/3
Ah, thanks.
The plural of novus is novae or novas in English (novus is Latin for nova).
themoreyouknow.jpg
so i'm at 1700/2000, and have had such little time to play for the past couple weeks that it's driving me insane. So close to being done but can't sit down and just do it. And literally every time I've had to raid, it coincided with a goddamn garuda bonus window.
think its feasable to knock that out tonight in 3~4 hours? probably not, but that's the upper limit of time that i'd have tonight
300 light in 4 hours is perfectly possible if you get a friendly bonus. If its Ultima or something, probably not.
Should be able to do garuda every 3mins (this factors in leaving the fight, and requeing). So 20 fights an hour. Thats 40light out-of-window and 80light in-window.
In theory you could get 300 light in 4 hours if it was garuda-bright
A-hem.
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/novus#Latin
Novi.
themoreyouknow.jpg
1) I said "in English" for a reason.
2) From the link you just posted, novae is also one of the Latin plural forms.
You're discussing translation into a different language, so your suspect grammar is up for criticism. Your grammar indicated that "novae or novas in English", which can indicate either that only "novas" is English, or (less likely) that both are. So basically, you were ambiguous at best. Not that I would expect you to understand Latin (I do to a degree), but you're providing a plural in a different gender. The supplied term is male-gendered, so the appropriate plural is "novi" and not "novae", which is the feminine plural.
Basically, since Square has declared the term to be masculine (likely unintentionally, by virtue of calling it "novus" and not "nova"), the appropriate plural is "novi", not "novae".