I'm wondering why Kuya thinks that love for a man = gay fag love.
Or why a group of retards in America who have no clue about one of the key founding reasons for America. Religious freedom should still be an important thing.
Its funny how Kuya's love for gay men and hate for America cloud his ability to even be a decent troll.
Also, this Hysteria over Muslims isnt just an American thing, its a worldwide thing. Maybe its a disease like being gay?
why is it that the people who are most vocally opposed to muslims/islam pronounce anything to do with islam (muslim,islam, muhammad, mosque etc) slightly incorrectly. is it that they are just stupid people who fell off phonics or are they doing it on purpose and pretending like they aren't
Tit for tat? Really?
That right there is what I refer to as "a metric fuck ton," of judging. Who are you to make these assumptions? The truth is, for all you know Kuya could be a 78 year old woman in Alaska meandering about the internet.
It's so hard to hold back on my Jesus jokes right now.![]()
Just because you put parts of what I say in bold, doesn't mean that I only said those things.
Edit: Goodnight!
How many muslim children were beheaded at these protests? I do not need exact numbers, just a rough estimate. Also, can you please included the number of dead/injured in the subsequent firebombings of the protested mosques?
Always the butt-hurt victims...
Oh...and I am sure this is all Israel's fault some how. My guess is that these protests are being funded by the evil Zionists.
inb4 bigot, racist (the lefts 2 favorite responses when they have no answer)
also...crusades, Jews, right wing, conservative
*smug sense of retroactive self-righteousness*
I'm curious, wouldn't the separation of church and state already cover banning the use of Shariah law in courts in the USA? Why would there be a need for further clarification?Oklahoma lawmakers are asking voters to weigh in on a proposal that would ban local courts from considering Shariah or other international law in their rulings.
The unusual measure calling for an amendment to the Oklahoma Constitution was approved in late May by the state Senate, sending the issue to voters in the fall in the form of a ballot question.
Though the question's supporters have not pointed to any specific outbreak of Shariah, or Islamic law, being considered in the U.S. judicial system, they describe it as an encroaching threat. State Rep. Rex Duncan, author of the measure, has called the ballot question a "preemptive strike" against Shariah coming to his state.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...hariah-courts/
Civil court. Divorce, marriage, distribution of property, etc. We do it for orthodox catholics and jews all the time.
Is that because the laws covering these types of issues are directly related to laws coming out of Christian and Jewish laws/traditions (like how a lot of Western laws can be traced back to stuff written in the Bible), or is there a more obvious connection between the religions and how these issues are settled?
Anyway, Egon fell into a trap on the first post and I'm disappointed in all of you for not catching it. In the future, here is how it plays out:
Person 1: "Oh man, look at how badly we're treating _____ over here in America. We're infringing upon the civil liberties they're guaranteed as citizens by the constitution."
Person 2: "Don't act like it's a one way street man, they discriminate against _____ in their country too."
Person 1: "Yeah, but they're a third world theocracy and we're the global symbol of religious and personal freedom. We should be using different standards."