
Originally Posted by
Maxwell
I have, and read the book too.
You're debate is still fundamentally flawed. As is the movie (and the book), which is out of character for Carl Sagan who was pretty vehement in his anti-theist philosophies. In the book he attempted to show theists that there would be a fundamental principle that could prove the existence of a higher being, by hiding proof in deep mathematics. However he made the mistake of "pulling out patterns in infinite series" which is horrifically silly. It's silly because an infinite random series will be capable of pulling out -any- combination you wish if you searched long enough. The movie however tried to assert that science itself took faith, which was again -horrifically- incorrect, as there is no single scientific concept that requires a leap of faith. And before you dare go down this path of "yes science does require faith", I'll stop you there and just let you know that it is just your ignorance of science and scientific concepts, not the scientific method that requires faith. Don't waste our time going down that path.