Augs throughout this:
Valorous DA WS augs: str+15, acc/atk+25, DA +4
Valorous DA TP augs: str +7, acc/atk +15, DA +5
Valorous STP augs: str +7, acc/atk +15, STP+8
Valorous WSD: str +10, acc/atk +25, WSD +4
These augs and gearsets were kept consistent between the spreadsheet and the simulator.
Food: Red Curry Bun +1
Buffs: SV Honor/blade/min 5/no fourth song
Bolster Frailty, Fury, Percision, Torpor
Haste II, Boost STR, Escha Buffs x1,
Dia III, Angon, Distract III all on
No Rolls
TP Gear:
Trish/utu/ginsen
Flamma +2/anu/brutal/sherida
Valorous STP/acro STP/niq/petrov
Brig dex+da/ioskeha +1/valorous stp/flamma +2
Rhong/utu/focal orb
Flamma +2/ganesha/brutal/sherida
Dagon/flamma +2/niq/petrov
Brig dex+da/ioskeha +1/valorous DA/flamma +2
Stardiver Gear:
Trish/utu/knob
Flamma +2/fotia/moonshade/sherida
Dagon/sulevia +2/niq/regal
Brig str+da/fotia/valorous/flamma +2
Camlanns Gear:
Rhong/utu/knob
Valor/fotia/ishvara/sherida
Valour/valor/niq/karieyh +1
Brig str+wsd/fotia/vishap +3/sulevia
100 WoCs:
No Rolls.
Trishula White Damage: ~19% (WS Damage): ~81%
- 4,557.42 (20,688.143)
- 4,643.78 (20,962.93)
- 4,802.76 (21,601.802)
- 4,800.44 (21,515.317)
- 4,646.16 (21,246.341)
- 4,862.51 (21,840.159)
- 4,683.94 (21,448.365)
- 4,782.24 (21,484.848)
- 4,684.17 (21,396.54)
- 4,641.71 (21,254.207)
Range: 305.09 damage between high and low
Rhong White Damage: ~43% (WS Damage): ~57%
- 4,948.69 (17,513.134)
- 4,986.34 (17,960.682)
- 4,854.98 (17,162.058)
- 4,711.41 (17,043.537)
- 4,936.67 (17,405.844)
- 4,871.03 (17,140.189)
- 4,816.43 (17,298.169)
- 4,842.51 (16,971.211)
- 4,812.44 (17,280.438)
- 4,750.57 (16,719.847)
Range: 274.93 damage between high and low
Hundred 3 Minute Averages in Sim: Trish: 4,710.513 Rhong: 4,853.107 // 2.94% lead for Rhong
Spreadsheet Set DPS: 5261.111 to 5038.706 // 4.41% lead for Rhong
Spreadsheet WSAvg: Rhong 19,036 Trish 23,115
With Rolls.
Add SAM and Fighters at 11, +7, no job bonus, TP Set changes:
Trish/utu/ginsen
Flamma +2/ganesha/brutal/sherida
Valorous STP/sulevia +2/niqmaddu/petrov
Brig dex+da/ioskeha +1/valor STP/flamma +2
Rhong/utu/focal orb
Flamma +2/ganesha/brutal/sherida
Dagon/flamma +2/niq/petrov
Brig dex+da/ioskeha +1/valor DA/flamma +2
WS sets remains the same
Trish White Damage: ~13% (WS Damage) ~87%
- 6,311.68 (22,626.038)
- 6,343.62 (22,875.552)
- 6,479.08 (23,050.873)
- 6,518.72 (22,944.781)
- 6,545.62 (22,709.073)
- 6,396.8 (22,682.688)
- 6,536.97 (23,121.699)
- 6,330.51 (22,301.505)
- 6,416.59 (22,694.784)
- 6,430.27 (22,762.092)
Range:233.94 damage between high and low
Rhong White Damage: ~33% (WS Damage): ~67 %
- 6,185.46 (20,129.793)
- 6,123.82 (20,240.944)
- 6,291.58 (20,451.498)
- 6,140.2 (20,031.435)
- 6,052.92 (19,920.924)
- 6,117.02 (20,055.134)
- 6,126.51 (20,176.082)
- 6,201.88 (19,988.402)
- 6,116.39 (20,258.128)
- 6,105.79 (20,003.617)
Range:238.66 damage between high and low
Hundred 3 Minute Averages in Sim: Rhong 6,146.157 Trish 6,430.986 // 4.43%
lead for Trish without even including skillchains, and with no need to maintain AM3.
Spreadsheet Set DPS: Rhong 6564.873 Trish 6398.622 // 2.59% lead for Rhong
Spreadsheet WSAvg: Rhong 23,019 Trish 27,813
For funsies I added a valor body with QA+3 and a pair of hose with QA +3 to the spreadsheet. These lost the STR augment because you likely wont have it with such an augment. The body only added 0.37% to Rhongs DPS. The legs added 0.52%.
When added to Trish’s set the lead for Rhong was only 2.85%. So QA augments don’t really mean shit for Rhong, ~+0.26%. Adding QA to other pieces wouldn’t serve as much of a gain (if not just a loss even) most likely so I didn’t even bother.
100 Kouryus
No Rolls
Done averaging 100 WSs together for this, as it doesn’t even matter really.
Trish White Damage: ~18% (WS Damage) ~82%
- 4,647.6
- 4,752.22
- 4,703.46
- 4,721.91
- 4,683.94
- 4,603.6
- 4,533.71
- 4,487.19
- 4,579.31
- 4,697.02
Rhong White Damage: ~43% (WS Damage) ~57%
- 4,762.84
- 4,748.56
- 4,834.49
- 4,769.66
- 4,898.98
- 4,740.51
- 4,824.34
- 4,848.38
- 4,946.43
- 4,824.46
Hundred 3 Minute Averages in Sim: Trish: 4,697.02 Rhong: 4,819.865 // 2.55% lead for Rhong
Spreadsheet Set DPS: 5216.679 to 5002.736 // 4.27% lead for Rhong
With Rolls.
TP Set changes remain the same as before.
Trish White Damage: ~13% (WS Damage) ~87%
- 6,253.05
- 6,453.71
- 6,503.32
- 6,312.89
- 6,396.91
- 6,448.26
- 6,466.53
- 6,290.12
- 6,351.79
- 6,345.11
Rhong White Damage: ~33% (WS Damage): ~67 %
- 6,126.59
- 5,940.12
- 6,023.14
- 6,082.6
- 6,150.31
- 6,005.53
- 6,090.89
- 6,114.69
- 6,092.42
- 6,137.95
Hundred 3 Minute Averages in Sim: Trish: 6382.169 Rhong: 6076.424 // 4.8%
lead for Trish
Spreadsheet Set DPS: 6510.934 to 6349.028 // 2.55% lead for Rhong
Notes and Conclusions:
- Gear is temperamental. It is entirely possible with your gear that Trish beats Rhong regardless. I have seen these results in the sim plenty of times before playing around vetting Rhong in the past.
- Breaths were set in the spreadsheet at a minimum every time, meaning they do 380 damage instead of 1,046. Even on high end content they will get higher than this occasionally, meaning more to Trish. Don’t worry this is absolutely negligible for comparing the two.
Just note that this is added to the spreadsheet's WS damage. This along with the rounds over likely make up the difference in WS damage between the sheet and sim.
- The simulator doesn’t factor breaths.
- Double vorseals alone takes off about half a percent of Rhong’s on paper lead. Adloqium, Crystal Blessing, Crooked with a job bonus on either SAM or Fighters, etc all chip away at Rhong too.
- The biggest “lead” for Rhong is in an unlikely situation. Where you are fighting a mob with capped accuracy, attack, and haste, but no other buffs in a three minute fight starting at 3,000 TP and maintaining AM3.
If this was an apex mob or Eschan NM, then you’d be SCing anyway in which the win easily goes to Trish. Even then AM3 ticks down out of combat while changing targets on fodder and certain events.
The only way to try take SCs from Trish is to reduce frequency via a crowded alliance with a melee slugfest. These zergs only happen in endgame, and typically always come with COR (or even SMN) buffs, either via a player or one of peoples many mules. Most groups don’t take an alliance of DDs to fight things though. So once again, unlikely Rhong’s niche is ever realized, and even when it is it still should lose almost every time to Trish.
The only other serious reach that comes to mind would be if you maintained AM3 while being frequently amnesiaed. Also doesn’t really happen, and you likely wouldn’t be maintaining AM3 anyway if it were. So, big whoop.
- You can WS faster than .815 seconds after gaining 1k+ TP in zergs. It isn’t hard to hit your WS button prematurely as you are getting TP in order to WS faster. WSing in 0.4075 seconds after getting TP gains Trish over a full percent in DPS compared to Rhong. It may seem fast, but it happens regularly.
Still, the TP over rounds in the sheet was kept above the average human reaction time to benefit Rhong. I mean the world is against Rhong so if it is getting decided on once and for all lets give it leeway for the benefit of the doubt.
- SCs happen in endgame fights and zergs even if you don’t try to make them happen. This easily would erase even a larger difference between the weapons in favor of Trish. You would have to go somewhere over around a couple dozen and a half WSs in a row without SCing for Rhong to actually win.
Just self darking with yourself via Trishula Stardiver spam while solo is a huge DPS boost that can’t be touched by anything in the game. It isn’t even a contest there at all.
- Rhong honestly has to start winning by close to ~10%+before it becomes worth using. Occasionally closing even an uncommon and random level 2 or 3 with Trish is just a significant DPS gain. With ~3k Stardiver damage over over Rhong, Trish can easily wipe the floor with it.
Taking anything that isn’t Trish into 99% of situations means you don’t care about how much damage you do. Which is fine, but don’t dare try to defend that choice as optimal.
- By this point who fucking cares, you made a trophy weapon (Rhong) for an absolute minuscule gain on paper in unrealistic or rare situations. If you didn’t already have HQ synthed gear like Ioskeha Belt +1 then you are a fool for wasting money instead of buying straight upgrades.
- Making trophy weapons doesn’t make you “a serious DRG”. Using that argument as a reason to make Rhong more likely makes you someone desperately trying to justify their bias. It doesn’t matter if anyone is a “completionIST” either. No one really thinks a person with all the 50 state quarters, a collection of stamps, and every issue of Maxim Magazine ever released is a cool cat. It just means they have an subjectively lame hobby; maybe a lack of a social life.
- The spreadsheet isn’t using Camlanns and is maintaining AM better than a player can. The simulator also maintains AM3 better than a player will. Which is partly why we stick to the 3 minute sims which give the best shot of ever winning to Rhong. It starts the fight with 3k TP and gains AM.
Otherwise any “lead” of Rhongomiant is completely lost and likely (if not completely) a deficit over the course of 5,000 attack rounds with perfect maintenance of AM3.
Keep in mind the simulator isn't using Jump either. Which doesn't matter because you don't need it for AM3 in the 3 minute sims.
Anyway, this is shown in the raw data for WoC below where the “Simulated Average” above the three minute sims is a 5,000 attack round simulation.
Essentially Rhong may only ever be justified if you either somehow have it and not Trishula or you are fighting one NM for 3 minutes or less (certainly a fight can be too short as well) with 3k TP ready beforehand. Where you never skillchain in a buffed up fight without COR rolls, SMN buffs, etc. So, basically never. It just doesn’t happen. Which makes Rhong a colossal waste of time and money.
It doesn’t matter how close Rhong gets if something I made in about 3 days with my linkshell for nearly free (yes, including eschite ores covering pop costs) beats something that would take me tons of money and much more time to finish.
Even buying Trish from mercs is cheaper than buying Rhong. Who in their right mind would recommend Rhong with the presented data?? It just isn’t practical.
- I also don’t want anyone calling bias. Rhong was given a fair shot. I only have an interest in finding the best option.
The guide originally stated Rhong was the best polearm, and I was starting to make it myself. This happened right as Austar released the sim. I have been vetting this polearm for over a month since and through gear updates and changes. I am now forever done with this shit as it took a lot of time. That being said, I will do some Gungnir and Ryu stuff though.
This is welcome to peer review, but not bullshit like possibly the worst ingame testing I have ever heard of:
Via Quetz in Reisenjima, to test “kill speed between Rhong and Trish”. Which, wow, that one was just bad. It was about as scientific as a Snapple cap. Kat doesn’t quite rival the original Nabis 3 hit zanshin build thread which was deleted and lost to history, but it isn’t far off.
Conclusion: Rhongo is Wrongo. Get the fuck over it, Kat.
Rhong can only "win" in extremely unlikely situations within a narrow time frame. Essentially it never does.
Sim raw data:
WoC No rolls:
Simulated Average: trishula 4639.82 (WS : 21102.61 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4687.74 (WS : 20994.5 )
4441.66 (WS : 20971.52 )
4489.71 (WS : 19976.71 )
4730.35 (WS : 20651.53 )
4573.86 (WS : 21126.29 )
4604.96 (WS : 20507.81 )
4496.43 (WS : 21403.57 )
4860.29 (WS : 21030.35 )
4094.23 (WS : 19958.08 )
4594.97 (WS : 20261.07 )
Average of runs: 4557.42
Simulated Average: trishula 4661.47 (WS : 21179.57 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4759.73 (WS : 21155.09 )
4627.9 (WS : 20599.0 )
5127.66 (WS : 22500.85 )
4412.27 (WS : 20339.11 )
4259.38 (WS : 19366.5 )
4693.94 (WS : 21633.56 )
4653.58 (WS : 20751.71 )
4607.85 (WS : 20677.45 )
4618.7 (WS : 21648.72 )
4676.83 (WS : 20957.31 )
Average of runs: 4643.78
Simulated Average: trishula 4666.75 (WS : 21184.81 )
AA Percent: 0.18 WS Percent: 0.82
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4939.68 (WS : 21732.7 )
4660.75 (WS : 21616.21 )
4618.57 (WS : 21206.93 )
4919.94 (WS : 22870.15 )
4751.98 (WS : 20857.33 )
4600.52 (WS : 20920.67 )
4948.5 (WS : 21519.5 )
5075.52 (WS : 23083.85 )
4782.47 (WS : 20693.17 )
4729.62 (WS : 21517.51 )
Average of runs: 4802.76
Simulated Average: trishula 4614.31 (WS : 21019.25 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4812.0 (WS : 21092.59 )
4748.81 (WS : 21160.48 )
4370.47 (WS : 19908.99 )
4646.48 (WS : 20438.61 )
4631.57 (WS : 21301.27 )
4880.48 (WS : 21317.97 )
5158.94 (WS : 23442.97 )
4858.87 (WS : 22196.5 )
4852.87 (WS : 21703.08 )
5043.94 (WS : 22590.71 )
Average of runs: 4800.44
Simulated Average: trishula 4594.56 (WS : 21043.81 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4065.68 (WS : 19351.33 )
4618.12 (WS : 21129.44 )
4664.51 (WS : 21489.14 )
4677.52 (WS : 20586.45 )
4667.27 (WS : 23287.75 )
4692.87 (WS : 21005.48 )
4924.35 (WS : 22057.96 )
4708.39 (WS : 21583.03 )
4750.15 (WS : 20870.69 )
4692.75 (WS : 21102.14 )
Average of runs: 4646.16
Simulated Average: trishula 4668.94 (WS : 21070.26 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
5145.03 (WS : 23480.97 )
5107.71 (WS : 22274.93 )
5178.32 (WS : 22005.77 )
4502.87 (WS : 21421.85 )
4770.08 (WS : 22604.23 )
4642.26 (WS : 19938.6 )
4804.76 (WS : 22942.72 )
4731.35 (WS : 20930.62 )
5061.48 (WS : 21948.01 )
4681.27 (WS : 20853.89 )
Average of runs: 4862.51
Simulated Average: trishula 4701.1 (WS : 21233.56 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
5362.86 (WS : 22171.43 )
4631.21 (WS : 21329.9 )
4431.61 (WS : 20270.74 )
4853.28 (WS : 22599.06 )
4721.52 (WS : 20996.44 )
4789.96 (WS : 22525.4 )
4375.51 (WS : 21000.24 )
4572.23 (WS : 21632.73 )
4626.86 (WS : 21483.24 )
4474.41 (WS : 20474.47 )
Average of runs: 4683.94
Simulated Average: trishula 4638.09 (WS : 21079.36 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4848.18 (WS : 21980.77 )
4599.2 (WS : 20965.86 )
5161.69 (WS : 23528.8 )
4871.13 (WS : 21943.02 )
4829.17 (WS : 21397.7 )
4881.43 (WS : 21162.01 )
4933.43 (WS : 21775.75 )
4577.05 (WS : 20836.77 )
4628.76 (WS : 21076.29 )
4492.37 (WS : 20181.51 )
Average of runs: 4782.24
Simulated Average: trishula 4647.98 (WS : 21111.47 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4479.17 (WS : 20256.73 )
4459.8 (WS : 20880.68 )
4793.74 (WS : 21990.5 )
5088.93 (WS : 23236.51 )
4810.42 (WS : 20388.21 )
4754.67 (WS : 21258.13 )
4819.53 (WS : 21715.76 )
4345.81 (WS : 20676.23 )
4602.4 (WS : 21828.22 )
4687.19 (WS : 21734.43 )
Average of runs: 4684.17
Simulated Average: trishula 4656.41 (WS : 21120.59 )
AA Percent: 0.19 WS Percent: 0.81
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
4663.17 (WS : 21750.27 )
4520.64 (WS : 20579.42 )
4570.78 (WS : 21180.96 )
4327.49 (WS : 19980.91 )
4606.69 (WS : 21174.99 )
4501.99 (WS : 20432.66 )
4655.12 (WS : 22539.86 )
4808.66 (WS : 21580.06 )
4815.99 (WS : 21760.37 )
4946.57 (WS : 21562.57 )
Average of runs: 4641.71
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4953.1 (WS : 18585.06 )
5174.09 (WS : 18246.45 )
4606.18 (WS : 16664.73 )
4868.54 (WS : 16491.12 )
4990.66 (WS : 17868.75 )
5078.49 (WS : 18223.31 )
4741.54 (WS : 16660.3 )
4816.79 (WS : 17765.3 )
5147.24 (WS : 17853.85 )
5110.27 (WS : 16772.47 )
Average of runs: 4948.69
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4665.34 (WS : 17308.42 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5065.6 (WS : 17133.24 )
4965.47 (WS : 18346.82 )
5186.85 (WS : 18494.01 )
4849.08 (WS : 17437.23 )
4976.64 (WS : 18145.31 )
4912.18 (WS : 17946.76 )
4672.98 (WS : 18148.22 )
5123.02 (WS : 17859.91 )
4864.26 (WS : 17736.63 )
5247.29 (WS : 18358.69 )
Average of runs: 4986.34
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4653.71 (WS : 17359.15 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4797.67 (WS : 17469.84 )
4884.15 (WS : 17901.54 )
4425.91 (WS : 16194.58 )
4572.76 (WS : 16834.17 )
5176.33 (WS : 17726.56 )
4825.97 (WS : 18068.75 )
4851.93 (WS : 16239.31 )
4862.77 (WS : 17220.31 )
4880.64 (WS : 17008.96 )
5271.67 (WS : 16956.56 )
Average of runs: 4854.98
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4676.75 (WS : 17343.69 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4336.26 (WS : 16926.47 )
4592.48 (WS : 16619.14 )
4966.7 (WS : 17445.03 )
5000.48 (WS : 17483.55 )
4590.22 (WS : 17044.74 )
4534.48 (WS : 16202.9 )
4584.4 (WS : 16508.63 )
4891.96 (WS : 18124.83 )
4979.45 (WS : 16661.98 )
4637.64 (WS : 17418.1 )
Average of runs: 4711.41
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4611.46 (WS : 17092.53 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5262.48 (WS : 17551.58 )
5417.91 (WS : 18350.26 )
5112.78 (WS : 18187.27 )
4824.48 (WS : 17273.22 )
5011.96 (WS : 17292.55 )
4870.68 (WS : 17268.01 )
5326.77 (WS : 18404.54 )
4573.86 (WS : 16772.18 )
4420.88 (WS : 15861.88 )
4544.88 (WS : 17096.95 )
Average of runs: 4936.67
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4713.03 (WS : 17418.47 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5452.99 (WS : 18554.51 )
4758.98 (WS : 15956.84 )
4423.14 (WS : 17163.83 )
5102.51 (WS : 17321.36 )
4929.37 (WS : 18123.7 )
4783.75 (WS : 16922.62 )
4969.52 (WS : 16530.5 )
4913.96 (WS : 16959.79 )
4616.5 (WS : 17083.18 )
4759.6 (WS : 16785.56 )
Average of runs: 4871.03
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4649.0 (WS : 17244.2 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4423.36 (WS : 16700.46 )
4817.45 (WS : 16443.96 )
4814.57 (WS : 16871.07 )
4742.87 (WS : 17189.75 )
4794.85 (WS : 17149.64 )
5044.63 (WS : 17951.08 )
4891.28 (WS : 18285.63 )
5152.18 (WS : 18430.07 )
4654.13 (WS : 16730.96 )
4829.01 (WS : 17229.07 )
Average of runs: 4816.43
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4645.52 (WS : 17204.08 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4867.87 (WS : 17711.93 )
4721.58 (WS : 16806.09 )
4991.23 (WS : 16086.62 )
4914.83 (WS : 17647.1 )
5163.73 (WS : 17945.59 )
5098.22 (WS : 16827.21 )
4915.91 (WS : 16421.7 )
4804.35 (WS : 17571.11 )
4351.19 (WS : 16521.24 )
4596.23 (WS : 16173.52 )
Average of runs: 4842.51
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4685.4 (WS : 17468.62 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4989.75 (WS : 16921.03 )
4804.36 (WS : 16886.85 )
4756.22 (WS : 17967.95 )
4883.83 (WS : 18628.11 )
4563.26 (WS : 15777.75 )
4990.81 (WS : 16864.85 )
4873.41 (WS : 17535.64 )
4387.93 (WS : 16306.57 )
5313.23 (WS : 18525.51 )
4561.56 (WS : 17390.12 )
Average of runs: 4812.44
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 4662.45 (WS : 17369.18 )
AA Percent: 0.43 WS Percent: 0.57
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
4956.96 (WS : 16910.27 )
4972.39 (WS : 17010.02 )
4877.88 (WS : 16599.89 )
4519.24 (WS : 17189.4 )
4409.92 (WS : 15224.78 )
4747.72 (WS : 16505.33 )
4585.12 (WS : 17010.55 )
4655.72 (WS : 16751.94 )
4821.88 (WS : 16788.9 )
4958.83 (WS : 17207.39 )
Average of runs: 4750.57
WoC with Rolls:
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5954.15 (WS : 20230.66 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6259.47 (WS : 19878.28 )
6255.96 (WS : 20689.95 )
5980.82 (WS : 19571.13 )
6050.21 (WS : 19711.95 )
5787.42 (WS : 18860.81 )
6338.07 (WS : 20514.24 )
6208.58 (WS : 19811.8 )
6229.33 (WS : 19810.03 )
6545.85 (WS : 21778.42 )
6198.85 (WS : 20671.32 )
Average of runs: 6185.46
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 6002.87 (WS : 20231.31 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6131.54 (WS : 20194.55 )
6026.28 (WS : 20101.95 )
6316.4 (WS : 20004.88 )
6166.07 (WS : 20918.4 )
5958.12 (WS : 19437.71 )
6185.76 (WS : 20671.59 )
5798.18 (WS : 19535.27 )
5990.15 (WS : 19637.07 )
6371.19 (WS : 21378.18 )
6294.51 (WS : 20529.84 )
Average of runs: 6123.82
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5976.45 (WS : 20096.7 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6284.78 (WS : 19969.9 )
6325.65 (WS : 20926.08 )
6320.33 (WS : 21160.68 )
6252.94 (WS : 19922.8 )
6326.68 (WS : 20333.84 )
6372.61 (WS : 20490.38 )
5922.6 (WS : 19547.6 )
6304.8 (WS : 20959.47 )
6442.65 (WS : 20886.98 )
6362.78 (WS : 20317.25 )
Average of runs: 6291.58
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5958.79 (WS : 20011.94 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6192.88 (WS : 20454.87 )
6000.96 (WS : 20946.85 )
5935.02 (WS : 19422.69 )
6243.14 (WS : 21090.78 )
6485.49 (WS : 20111.1 )
5969.55 (WS : 18934.53 )
6308.29 (WS : 20151.91 )
5888.01 (WS : 19466.46 )
6169.77 (WS : 19778.72 )
6208.85 (WS : 19956.44 )
Average of runs: 6140.2
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5966.17 (WS : 20153.92 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6266.15 (WS : 20293.91 )
5652.27 (WS : 18935.85 )
6489.68 (WS : 21265.1 )
5899.12 (WS : 20009.73 )
5901.43 (WS : 18959.69 )
6028.72 (WS : 19424.41 )
5912.75 (WS : 19984.1 )
6056.04 (WS : 20072.62 )
6108.63 (WS : 20013.19 )
6214.37 (WS : 20250.64 )
Average of runs: 6052.92
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 6036.65 (WS : 20307.73 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5791.85 (WS : 19302.29 )
6204.13 (WS : 20015.86 )
6326.13 (WS : 20252.74 )
6297.48 (WS : 19856.96 )
5960.1 (WS : 19535.43 )
6085.58 (WS : 20493.98 )
6192.44 (WS : 20975.28 )
6465.73 (WS : 20112.13 )
5786.31 (WS : 20354.52 )
6060.45 (WS : 19652.15 )
Average of runs: 6117.02
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5970.7 (WS : 20091.72 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5812.99 (WS : 19589.04 )
5847.75 (WS : 20263.83 )
5750.25 (WS : 19372.27 )
6530.53 (WS : 21009.15 )
6332.7 (WS : 20658.32 )
5945.76 (WS : 19934.75 )
6471.18 (WS : 20340.59 )
6463.03 (WS : 20685.27 )
6004.52 (WS : 19846.75 )
6106.4 (WS : 20060.85 )
Average of runs: 6126.51
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5987.75 (WS : 20281.62 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6222.9 (WS : 19693.07 )
6069.0 (WS : 20224.49 )
6101.0 (WS : 20145.97 )
6153.65 (WS : 19893.56 )
6073.37 (WS : 19244.7 )
6648.19 (WS : 20892.44 )
6012.88 (WS : 19394.39 )
6221.82 (WS : 19471.96 )
6431.2 (WS : 20507.23 )
6084.76 (WS : 20416.21 )
Average of runs: 6201.88
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5989.45 (WS : 20151.62 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
6400.65 (WS : 21378.84 )
6111.11 (WS : 21083.42 )
6014.96 (WS : 19309.16 )
6090.97 (WS : 19848.74 )
6054.06 (WS : 20215.62 )
6331.42 (WS : 21476.44 )
6338.25 (WS : 19808.42 )
6167.07 (WS : 20667.36 )
5532.72 (WS : 19106.24 )
6122.72 (WS : 19687.04 )
Average of runs: 6116.39
Simulated Average: rhongomiant 5996.66 (WS : 20300.81 )
AA Percent: 0.33 WS Percent: 0.67
Three Minute Sims.: rhongomiant
5900.82 (WS : 19915.75 )
6527.97 (WS : 20729.51 )
6401.53 (WS : 20307.38 )
5646.15 (WS : 19295.22 )
5899.26 (WS : 20729.98 )
5797.46 (WS : 19646.69 )
6050.36 (WS : 19612.91 )
6302.97 (WS : 19676.34 )
6243.51 (WS : 19447.9 )
6287.82 (WS : 20674.49 )
Average of runs: 6105.79
Simulated Average: trishula 6361.1 (WS : 22636.66 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6206.76 (WS : 21750.58 )
6380.57 (WS : 22406.28 )
6079.65 (WS : 22940.47 )
6635.68 (WS : 22845.71 )
6464.09 (WS : 22830.2 )
6141.48 (WS : 22296.39 )
6086.96 (WS : 22148.29 )
6714.24 (WS : 23582.75 )
6134.52 (WS : 22063.79 )
6272.9 (WS : 23395.92 )
Average of runs: 6311.68
Simulated Average: trishula 6397.87 (WS : 22631.93 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6417.55 (WS : 22274.54 )
6288.96 (WS : 22650.08 )
6354.56 (WS : 22173.35 )
6624.36 (WS : 23290.15 )
6240.19 (WS : 22439.28 )
6275.02 (WS : 23590.3 )
6361.66 (WS : 22672.53 )
6117.56 (WS : 22494.97 )
6306.16 (WS : 23973.32 )
6450.19 (WS : 23197.0 )
Average of runs: 6343.62
Simulated Average: trishula 6338.27 (WS : 22579.23 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6359.16 (WS : 22561.72 )
6902.56 (WS : 23333.14 )
6611.83 (WS : 23095.55 )
6368.56 (WS : 22520.13 )
6607.71 (WS : 23518.71 )
6441.87 (WS : 23552.41 )
6037.73 (WS : 22105.11 )
6433.71 (WS : 23525.11 )
6421.33 (WS : 23082.76 )
6606.31 (WS : 23214.09 )
Average of runs: 6479.08
Simulated Average: trishula 6351.62 (WS : 22634.67 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6442.66 (WS : 22802.37 )
6394.3 (WS : 22268.23 )
6277.72 (WS : 22942.52 )
6631.37 (WS : 23046.78 )
6503.35 (WS : 22344.17 )
6487.33 (WS : 22458.89 )
6763.09 (WS : 23759.1 )
6207.17 (WS : 22083.94 )
6753.84 (WS : 24429.21 )
6726.38 (WS : 23312.6 )
Average of runs: 6518.72
Simulated Average: trishula 6352.91 (WS : 22558.28 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
5949.5 (WS : 21666.3 )
7051.97 (WS : 23641.28 )
6429.75 (WS : 22192.81 )
6335.17 (WS : 22022.06 )
6694.3 (WS : 22797.47 )
6696.54 (WS : 23448.03 )
6622.0 (WS : 22439.94 )
6593.1 (WS : 23142.52 )
6888.77 (WS : 23430.52 )
6195.07 (WS : 22309.8 )
Average of runs: 6545.62
Simulated Average: trishula 6347.01 (WS : 22543.48 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6177.82 (WS : 22796.02 )
6246.75 (WS : 22076.77 )
6630.24 (WS : 23583.02 )
6142.25 (WS : 21461.79 )
6595.8 (WS : 23499.43 )
6712.03 (WS : 23226.35 )
6496.77 (WS : 22778.68 )
6206.75 (WS : 22598.39 )
6498.16 (WS : 22781.6 )
6261.44 (WS : 22024.83 )
Average of runs: 6396.8
Simulated Average: trishula 6352.19 (WS : 22611.35 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6433.88 (WS : 22062.95 )
6758.27 (WS : 23158.04 )
6037.16 (WS : 21975.8 )
6576.64 (WS : 23927.45 )
6345.7 (WS : 22598.49 )
6440.29 (WS : 23550.9 )
7028.29 (WS : 24762.48 )
6589.28 (WS : 23789.89 )
6594.22 (WS : 22999.42 )
6566.01 (WS : 22391.57 )
Average of runs: 6536.97
Simulated Average: trishula 6371.41 (WS : 22528.19 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6063.07 (WS : 22165.93 )
5900.36 (WS : 21806.36 )
6848.8 (WS : 23324.02 )
6426.2 (WS : 22718.71 )
6076.75 (WS : 21891.09 )
6526.95 (WS : 22698.65 )
6467.5 (WS : 22223.52 )
6332.58 (WS : 21859.42 )
6418.88 (WS : 22864.98 )
6244.06 (WS : 21462.37 )
Average of runs: 6330.51
Simulated Average: trishula 6398.56 (WS : 22656.41 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6089.71 (WS : 21482.97 )
6221.32 (WS : 22074.71 )
6500.45 (WS : 22162.81 )
6650.81 (WS : 23652.99 )
6499.88 (WS : 22449.25 )
6663.56 (WS : 24406.89 )
6469.28 (WS : 22684.66 )
5980.07 (WS : 21739.78 )
6536.34 (WS : 23496.82 )
6554.51 (WS : 22796.96 )
Average of runs: 6416.59
Simulated Average: trishula 6359.91 (WS : 22512.3 )
AA Percent: 0.13 WS Percent: 0.87
Three Minute Sims.: trishula
6163.16 (WS : 22253.89 )
6296.43 (WS : 21796.76 )
6575.0 (WS : 22276.18 )
6363.47 (WS : 23407.98 )
6709.87 (WS : 23458.17 )
6216.76 (WS : 22886.99 )
6273.69 (WS : 22245.72 )
6210.55 (WS : 22040.21 )
7031.71 (WS : 24297.71 )
6462.09 (WS : 22957.31 )
Average of runs: 6430.27