Meanwhile, kids can still go to their local library (It's like a blockbuster video rental for books) and read as much material, that the PTC would consider subversive or obscene, as they want.
Meanwhile, kids can still go to their local library (It's like a blockbuster video rental for books) and read as much material, that the PTC would consider subversive or obscene, as they want.
I remember having this read to me in 2nd/3rd grade (forget which, had same teacher both years): Hatchet and there's a scene in there where the kid has to swim back into a plane that crashed and is right there next to a decaying dead body which did get described fairly gruesomely from what I recall.
But you sure couldn't show that in a movie without it being rated R!
Ahahahaa someone broke down Alito's dissenting opinion:
These are held up as examples of games the law was intended to protect children from, yet I never, ever saw them on Gamestop/Best Buy's shelves. Several are no longer available for various reasons (I suspect chief amongst them a lack of interest). I feel gypped.IDing some of the games mentioned in the Alito dissenting opinion:
School Shooter: North American Tour 2012, a Source mod. I assume it's less thoughtfully made than Super Columbine Massacre RPG. http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/04/20/...tech-killings/"It also appears that there is no antisocial theme too base for some in the video game industry to exploit. There are games in which a player can take on the identity and reenact the killings carried out by the perpetrators of the murders at Columbine High School and Virginia Tech."
Hentai game Rapelay from 2006. Come on, media. The graphics in the current generation of Japanese rape simulators are so much more realistic. It's like when you were hot and bothered by Doom in 2001 all over again. http://articles.cnn.com/2010-03-30/w...nt?_s=PM:WORLD"The objective of one game is to rape a mother and her daughters;"
Is he really talking about Custer's Revenge for the 2600? Really? Citation is a People article from 1982."in another, the goal is to rape Native American women."
Ethnic Cleansing, developed by a white supremacist group. http://www.wired.com/culture/lifesty.../2002/02/50523"There is a game in which players engage in 'ethnic cleansing' and can choose to gun down African-Americans, Latinos, or Jews."
JFK Reloaded, a simulation designed to prove it's possible for Oswald to have acted alone. http://www.slate.com/id/2110034 Blooper reel! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKvOz6BMZAs"In still another game, players attempt to fire a rifle shot into the head of President Kennedy as his motorcade passes by the Texas School Book Depository."
I think it's a point of company policy for big box stores to not stock AO games, so yah government intervention = pointless for most of those games. Both JFK and School Shooter (should it ever come out) are downloadable freeware, as far as I can tell, so any legislated point of sales prohibition becomes moot. Rapelay was never meant for distribution in America, and Ethnic Cleansing does not appear to have ever existed in any playable form (even the official website has no usable links on it any longer). So as it turns out, Alito/Yee/the PTC is only practically capable of defending America's youth from 29 year old 192x160 8-bit porn on the Atari 2600.
roflIs he really talking about Custer's Revenge for the 2600? Really? Citation is a People article from 1982.
Also I'm pretty sure the Hentai rape game would fall under the definition of pornography (or obscenity, whichever is the "I know it when I see it" definition") and therefore not be protected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it
Which is exactly why large companies make it a point of corporate policy to not stock pornographic games, as it opens them up to liability. Even if they could theoretically win such cases, they don't want the potential cost of such litigation to wreck their bottom lines. Some go as far as to card people for M rated games. How about that, don't regulate healthy, competitive industries and shit turns out all right.
ES....
the movie version of that book is only rated PG
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099327/
This whole ban was ridiculous anyway... Why would the kid have $60 to buy the game from the store anyway, and why would he be able to play it without his parents seeing it. Hell, why would the kid be in the store without his parents? It's stupid people asking the government to step in when they can't be parents to their own kids.
I worked at a retail store for several years, and it was store policy to card anyone buying R rated videos/DVDs or M rated games. The register would lock up until we entered the birthdate from the ID. I suppose someone could fake that easily enough, but the Media Dept. had video cameras everywhere and such action would be caught on tape and get you fired. I find it hard to believe that Walmart/KMart/Best Buy/etc. wouldn't have a similar policy in place...
iirc ya, but I saw that movie over 15 years ago.
Roger Ebert may be the most prevalent online troll this year:
Are people ever going to realize that parents are supposed to be regulating this shit? Or is the government eventually going to be raising our kids?