i have some really smart people on my facebook.
I got 15, did I miss something.
nvm now I got 14, I don't get it.
pretty sure she's correct due to order of operations BEDMAS
brackets
equations [?] forgot if this is correct, too lazy to google
division
multiplication (she did this first) 1 x 0 = 0
addition 1 + 1 +1 +1 +1 +1 + 1 + 1 +1 + 1 = 10, + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5, + 0
subtraction -1
It's a question that is purposefully written ambiguously. And we've already had a long discussion about it in previous pages of I believe this RIT thread, possibly the last one. The fact that it isn't written with any parenthesis or brackets confuses people.
[edit]
PEMDASpretty sure she's correct due to order of operations BEDMAS
brackets
equations [?] forgot if this is correct, too lazy to google
division
multiplication (she did this first) 1 x 0 = 0
addition 1 + 1 +1 +1 +1 +1 + 1 + 1 +1 + 1 = 10, + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 5, + 0
subtraction -1
Parenthesis
Exponents
although parenthesis and brackets are the same thing
I have some really smart people on my BG?
I prefer SADMEP
i love basic math trolling
Q: How many mathematicians does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
A: 0.999999....
http://www.xamuel.com/images/2is1.JPG
So glad I'm more of an English guy than a math guy. Numbers freak me the hell out once start replacing them with letters.
x=0.999999
10x=9.999999
10x-x=9.999999-.999999
9x=9
x=1
1=0.999999
No need for variables that equal 0
The last part, 2(a-x)=a-x is true. (Which confused me for a second) If you substitute any number in, it just adds up to 0=0. Not 2=1.
i'd ask why you guys are explaining it, but lol.