I would fall under sysadmin... and this seems about right.
I would fall under sysadmin... and this seems about right.
Mainly i'm the "Bad Guy" because i'm the one that holds the keys to resources and i have to balance that with the budget. So when someone comes in and requests a new server and tells me they need 24 CPU's 60 gigs of ram and 10 TB's of space I have to tell them to fuck off over and over until they give me reasonable specs. Otherwise, i pretty lax on most things.
I’m on the other side
I bitch hey there is a giant vulnerability with like 20 pc no firewall it’s all under windows 10 GA and has a expired antivirus
And and this exchange 2016 has no CU
To be sais bah it’s not important, then when the client get hacked I have to pass 20000 interviews at why this wasn’t patched before
When I show them all the emails of warning they tell me. oh that’s what you meant? Well you should’ve insisted harder
also tonight is my MS-100 exam
100% sure I'll fail I didn't study much and this was a free exam with limited time so
Microsoft Licensing rules:
Tier 1: Yeah, this doesnt' cover the basics, it's just the first sniff.
Tier 3: You're halfway to compliance, but you know better, don't you?
Tier 5: This is kinda sorta the stuff you actually need to be compliant, but we pretend otherwise so we can make all the price sensitive suckers get caught up in our evil web. So fuck you and give us your money sooner rather than later!
Failed 686/700
Next time!
oh im happy about the result got LOTS of question about stuff I didn't study yet so
Possibly dumb question. Does BG have a dark mode in the browser?
Settings >> General Settings >> Miscellaneous Options >> Fourm Skin >> Blackened Smart
Thanks dude
Not me, but one of the developers today made quite a spectacle of himself. Sent an email to our help desk team, the system admin team, the development team, and the bosses of the latter 2 teams saying to make a ticket and assign it to someone to fix an issue where his AJAX calls weren't working on a site he deployed to the development environment claiming the code isn't the issue "and the new infrastructure (which we've had in place for 2-3 years now) is killing us"
I'm not really sure who all has access to the help desk email inbox, but that email went to around 16+ people.
English as a third language is biting me a little; so I phail! Halp!
1. "Add custodians to a case. This is the first step after creating a case. Custodians are people who have administrative control of a document or electronic file that could be relevant to the case."
2. Search custodial data sources for data relevant to the case. After custodians have been added to a case, you can use the built-in search tool to find the custodian locations for data that might be relevant. You do this by using keywords, properties, and conditions to build your search queries, which will return search results that contain data that's likely to be relevant to the case. You can preview search results to quickly verify whether the data is relevant and revise your queries and rerun searches to improve results.
(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/lea...overy-workflow)
It is a littlle unclear to me here if the custodian is the -original- content holder, or an assigned role to hold the documents in custody of sorts? (I am 94% sure it is the last, but ..)
wtf is a custodian lol
In general english someone responsible for taking care of something/someone, but in this context, fml?
(started working on the SC series of MS certifications, Security, Compliance and Identity, Figure I'll try to combine MS500 with SC900, and SC300+400)
I did find this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/mic...o365-worldwide which suggests it can be both, but my latter assumption is more accurate.
edit2: "The Electronic Discovery Reference Model (EDRM) defines a custodian as a “[p]erson having administrative control of a document or electronic file; for example, the data custodian of an email is the owner of the mailbox which contains the message.”"