Originally Posted by

**Nyarlko**
@Darvamos: I've recently taken to posting things on Discord and linking from there. It's super simple, plus works great so far, but I have no idea what the data storage limit is per channel. Seems to be pretty high though given how many pics you can have at least?

Try using Macarons to close up the break gap and see if the new successes convert to NQs or HQs? I notice that if you disregard the breaks, 29/1877 = 1.55%, which is spot on for the x/64 HQ Rate model. I think that HQ rate is set as a percentage/fraction of your current success rate (~95% in your test), rather than 100%. This may be previously known info, but I don't think I've ever noticed it posted anywhere.

For the numbers posted here so far, Darvamos has been using the HQ/NQ (ignore breaks) formula, and you've been using HQ/total formula, so after conversion, your numbers are a bit higher.

"All right. Rusk no ring. 1000 synths, 880 nqs, 79 hqs, 41 breaks. ~7.9%." >>> 79/880 = .08977

"2k synths: Breaks- 94 ~ 4.7%, NQ- 1877, HQ- 29 ~1.45" >>> 29/1877 = .01545