Predisent Donald J. Trump: Episode VI: Return of the Wall

[6souls]

Spoiler: show

David Lynch (Twin Peaks) - “He could go down as one of the greatest presidents in history because he has disrupted the thing so much. No one is able to counter this guy in an intelligent way.
Our so-called leaders can’t take the country forward, can’t get anything done. Like children, they are. Trump has shown all this.”
https://www.theguardian.com/film/201...ish-twin-peaks

Lynch voted for Bernie, btw.

Criminal Prosecutions Against Migrants have been Temporarily Suspended by Border Protections
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44609876

Mueller seeking an Interview with Randy Credico to Question his links between Roger Stone & Julian Assange
https://www.npr.org/2018/06/25/62319...aign-wikileaks

[BerenTebogo]

> Not using Space Force in the title

Fucking what even is this

[synistar]

Obviously saving it for Episode VII: The Space Force Awakens

[Fiye]

Probably could've made Return of the Koreas better.

I dunno. Return of the Wall is pretty weak.

[synistar]

Considering the current optics focused on immigration and the demand any immigration reform bill has funding for a border wall, it's appropriate.

[Kaslo]

Obviously saving it for Episode VII: The Space Force Awakens

^This fo sho

[Gryffes]

2020: A Space Force Odyssey.

[Dotsudoku]

Travel ban was upheld by SCOTUS. Legal minds: does this have any impact on future cases of candidate promises vs executive ones, or is it assumed that the court made their decision based solely on the latter?

"things you say running for office have no baring on you should you attain said office" is a little unsettling

Edit: forgot we had a SCOTUS thread, probably relevant in both

[Kaslo]

Travel ban was upheld by SCOTUS. Legal minds: does this have any impact on future cases of candidate promises vs executive ones, or is it assumed that the court made their decision based solely on the latter?

"things you say running for office have no baring on you should you attain said office" is a little unsettling

Edit: forgot we had a SCOTUS thread, probably relevant in both

To be honest, I'm not surprised by the outcome, I always thought EO-2 solved the legal problems of EO-1.

[Zetanio]

This thread fucking sucks. The other one was only at 60 pages.

[Melena]

This thread fucking sucks. The other one was only at 60 pages.

100 at standard formatting which is the breaking point where the forums go boink.

[Zetanio]

Always the fucking casuals fucking this up.

[Kaslo]

Always the fucking casuals fucking this up.

[Lokus]

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/06/26/...an-excuse.html

Trump threatening Harley Davidson for their decision to move some production overseas to counter the EU tariffs.

[Andalusian girls]

i think he forgets sometimes he isn't allowed to tax things

[Deftscythe]

i think he forgets sometimes he isn't allowed to tax things

To say he forgets implies he ever knew

[Patriarch]

Was hoping for something along the lines of "From Russia with Love"

[Gredival]

Travel ban was upheld by SCOTUS. Legal minds: does this have any impact on future cases of candidate promises vs executive ones, or is it assumed that the court made their decision based solely on the latter?

"things you say running for office have no baring on you should you attain said office" is a little unsettling

Edit: forgot we had a SCOTUS thread, probably relevant in both

Whenever there's contextual history that conservative Justices dislike, they dismiss it by talking about textualism. When there's a clear meaning to a law that conservatives don't like, they redefine it by redefining certain words ala carte by talking about plain meaning. Scalia ran this playbook for them for decades.

[Zealot]

Scalia gets a lot of credit for brilliant writing but having had to read a lot of his work, I think he was a goddamn moron who just happened to be on the Supreme Court where his bullshit could sound forceful and deep.

[6souls]