SCOTUS Thread (News and Discussion) II: Rape Isn't On My Calendar

[Dimmauk]

Lord Jesus yall so sensitive about Day posting anything

All I do is check BG, looking for Day posts to comment on.

[Andalusian girls]

i know what it is to love

[Karbuncle]

i know what it is to love

I-its not like he likes him or anything, baka.

[Dimmauk]

I-its not like he likes him or anything, baka.

Speak for yourself bro

[Dimmauk]

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1...858863104?s=20

[Kirin]

If Collins and Murkowski vote present, would that mean Pence would be the tiebreaker at 49+1 yes votes?

[Salodin]

Pence can break a tie, yes. I cant see Collins or Murkowski voting no, and Romney voting yes tho, and if he does then its dead in the water.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Kirin]

But the two ladies voting "present" means the sitting Senate is effectively at 98 instead of 100, correct? That would mean up to 2 more Republicans can vote "no" and Pence would still break a 49 tie.

[Zealot]

Well honestly the larger play here is keeping Roe v. Wade intact, which is the top Republican legal priority. If it ever gets overturned they lose the biggest driver of single-issue voters to the polls, the ongoing invisible existential threat of women controlling their own bodies.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk

[Tarage]

You found Tarage's twitter account.

Don't you have to have them accept your case in order for it to even get up there? My understanding was if they don't accept it stays with the lower court's ruling.

[Anoat]

Mitch about to become the most hated man in america after this week, the RBG shit plus rejecting a bill to avoid government shutdown that everyone assumed he would approve.

[Salodin]

Uh, he isn't? Wtf why?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Cail]

I know its been speculated here, dont know if it actually got posted, but Murkowski came out yesterday and said she would not support a confirmation vote before the election

[kuronosan]

That's not the same thing as saying she would vote no.

Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

Yes yes we get it, none of this excuses a lame duck session vote. But prior to the election, odds are we aren't getting this seat filled.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Cail]

Another moderate:

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1308132693926973443

[Tarage]

How many of them will fall on their convictions after the election if they get voted out?

[Gredival]

I mean Manchin is a Democrat there's no way he would have voted to replace...

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

[Day]

Another moderate:

https://twitter.com/Acosta/status/1308132693926973443

So Nov 4th?

[Yabby]

How many of them will fall on their convictions after the election if they get voted out?

Everyone that is using their... convictions... right now is not really using it. They know that if they push this through, and Dems sweep this election, they will make this all pointless. If they wait, and the dems win, nothing changes, and the courts till stay right-leaning. If they push this through and the dems grow some balls, they pack the court and it goes liberal.

Edit: That said, if they wait and the dems don't take the senate.... expect them to push through the lame duck.