I mean, men can get pregnant and men can have periods
*if they have female anatomy.
But like
If they don't
Then no obviously
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I mean, men can get pregnant and men can have periods
*if they have female anatomy.
But like
If they don't
Then no obviously
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCynic...the_extent_of/
https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCriti...ays_packaging/ weird post about the period thing
some stuff about TERFs, idk man.
I believe it started mainly as a medical thing, for providers to keep in mind that a transman or transwoman may have different medical needs that you shouldn't forget about. Like a transman may or may not need a yearly pap smear or a pregnancy test, a transwoman is still at risk for prostate cancer, etc.
As an example of this, when the hospital I am at (a big one with even a large trans-specific clinic) switched to a new electronic medical record system, it was actually impossible for a provider to place the order for pap smear cytology or pregnancy test for a transman; they had added in the functionality for a patient's gender identity but hard coded certain orders to specific gender tags in the system.
It's my understanding that the trans-exclusionary feminist crowd took this and began using it in their criticism/propaganda for a while too
I mean
You need a uterus and other select reproductive organs to be pregnant
If you don’t have those, you can’t be pregnant
Not everyone has those, ergo
No, everyone cannot be pregnant. How does that make me a bigot for saying that?
Of course; and some people with those reproductive organs identify/live/whatever as a transman (weather you believe or care about the issue or not, that's how they are interacting with our current society). I doubt anyone is saying it's transphobic to say "a uterus is necessary to have a baby" but rather "if you have a uterus you are by definition a woman and should be treated as such." Of course I could be wrong, people will argue anything on the internet.
I think this goes into a broader failing of outspoken young adults flipping out over questions.
Like, as a teacher, I WANT people asking questions and seeking out information and learning. And I feel like that is what we were taught to do growing up.
Now there is this sense of, NO COMMUNICATIONS UNLESS YOU'VE SPENT 10 MONTHS MIN RESEARCHING THE SUBJECT AND COME TO THE CONVO AS AN ALREADY EXPERT.
I find this unfair, as even myself enjoys learning much more through interactions with others. It's not like the only thing you should do, but there shouldn't be a stigma against doing it, either.
I believe this is in part what Obama was alluding to in that recent viral video. We have to break away from this idea that you must always be perfect, and if you are not, then you are not worth talking to.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50365609
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-goldman-sachs
Apple Pay's algorithm-based credit limiter is found to be biased against women. Goldman Sachs runs the physical card side of the business where the trouble is originating from.
David Heinemeier Hansson had complained that the Apple Card gave him 20 times the credit limit that his wife got.
In a tweet, Mr Hansson said the disparity was despite his wife having a better credit score.
Later, Mr Wozniak, who founded Apple with Steve Jobs, tweeted that the same thing happened to him and his wife despite their having no separate bank accounts or separate assets.
On Saturday, the investment bank told Bloomberg: "Our credit decisions are based on a customer's creditworthiness and not on factors like gender, race, age, sexual orientation or any other basis prohibited by law."
The Apple Card, launched in August, is Goldman's first credit card.
The iPhone maker markets Apple Card on its website as a "new kind of credit card, created by Apple, not a bank".
But it is created by a bank.
What they gonna do if you don’t pay, repossess yo iTunes?
"Women be shoppin"
-HAL 9000
Chick-fil-A announced they are no longer donating to anti LGBTQ charities.
Popeyes is still better.
50% chance you get assaulted going to Popeyes though
Low risk low reward as they say. I’d rather have to wait 15 extra minutes going through the Popeyes drive through than have to suffer through the chik fil a window employee trying to have a conversation with me as they wait to hand me a bag of food.