President Sonic T. Hedgehog: Episode XI: #TEAMSONIC2020

[Lokus]

lol

It's just the 2016 changes, Trump has to pee on everything Obama did.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...ections-102779

I want you to go ahead and read the very first bullet point.

1) It goes beyond overturning Obama to erase protections that have been in place for decades
The Trump administration has made a point of rolling back environmental rules put in place by its predecessor, accusing the Obama administration of federal overreach. But the new regulation goes much beyond repealing the Obama-era rule, unwinding the previous rules that have been in place to protect headwater streams and wetlands since the 1970s and ‘80s.

In case you were wondering what it means to argue with guartz.

[guartz]

That article is very misleading, specifically the parts Lokus highlighted is speculation from the article writer.

Here are the actual changes
https://www.epa.gov/nwpr/navigable-w...tep-two-revise

[Zealot]

Wait wait, I thought there was a scheme to get rid of her because she was getting in the way of investigating Biden?

mah narrative

Wait wait wait

She alleges that it is

You've been 100% willing at every turn to accept everything Trump or his allies says without evidence and use quotes from them as sufficient basis to deny anything else, even and especially when it is absolutely to their benefit to deny things.

Why is this different? Why not accept what she says at face value? Evidence means nothing in your world so I'm attempting to establish why one side gets the benefit of the doubt versus the other.

Also it's been repeatedly stated that Trump's shadow Ukrainian channel led by Giuliani is what wanted her gone, because she was interfering with their attempts to pressure Ukraine, and what better way to get rid of her than to easily goad the President into a temper tantrum?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

That article is very misleading, specifically the parts Lokus highlighted is speculation from the article writer.

Here are the actual changes
https://www.epa.gov/nwpr/navigable-w...tep-two-revise

It's been explained to you multiple times now why this is bad.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[guartz]

Wait wait wait

She alleges that it is

You've been 100% willing at every turn to accept everything Trump or his allies says without evidence and use quotes from them as sufficient basis to deny anything else, even and especially when it is absolutely to their benefit to deny things.

Why is this different? Why not accept what she says at face value? Evidence means nothing in your world so I'm attempting to establish why one side gets the benefit of the doubt versus the other.

Also it's been repeatedly stated that Trump's shadow Ukrainian channel led by Giuliani is what wanted her gone, because she was interfering with their attempts to pressure Ukraine, and what better way to get rid of her than to easily goad the President into a temper tantrum?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

uh Zealot, that entire video is a big nothing burger. At best, it only served to show how stupid and full of holes the narrative against Trump is, that's the entire point. The narrative is inconsistent, illogical and nobody believes it. Yanovich was recalled in 2019, like 8 months after that video. . . so what does it prove exactly? Trump blusters at dinner parties?

[Aerin]

... is a big nothing burger. At best, it only served to show how stupid and full of holes the narrative against Trump is, that's the entire point. The narrative is inconsistent, illogical and nobody believes it.

I feel like you have this section saved off and just alter the words a tad once a day.

[Zealot]

uh Zealot, that entire video is a big nothing burger. At best, it only served to show how stupid and full of holes the narrative against Trump is, that's the entire point. The narrative is inconsistent, illogical and nobody believes it. Yanovich was recalled in 2019, like 8 months after that video. . . so what does it prove exactly? Trump blusters at dinner parties?

Every time you say "nothingburger" Trump laughs directly in your face while peeing on you.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[mallister]

There's an image.

[Zealot]

https://www.lamag.com/citythinkblog/...A4MKI8DmlXLePs

Article is two months old, he's over 15,000 lies now.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox...mp-impeachment

Impeachment is helping Trump/spongebob

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[kuronosan]

Zealot you should know by now you only listen to the people you like when they're saying things that support you.

[Karbuncle]

There's an image.

I feel like he may have accidentally Freud'd a fetish to us.

[Infini]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox...mp-impeachment

Impeachment is helping Trump/spongebob

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'd take everything from Fox News with a truckload of salt tbh.

[archibaldcrane]

I'd take everything from Fox News with a truckload of salt tbh.

Fox News' pollster is held in high regard.

[Athas]

I mean even it wasn't, what would be the angle? Stir up fears that a majority support impeachment to do fundraising?

[kuronosan]

Fox News' pollster is held in high regard.

Nuh uh, only when the poll says Trump is doing awesome.

[Vaspinne]

Bolton allegations contradict Trump's denial that he refused aid for Biden investigation. Gonna post the Reddit thread link as it has like 10+ links to various websites and news outlets

https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/co..._advisor_john/

[Zealot]

Uh maybe you missed the part where this is all a big nothingburger because the timelines and statements that Trump makes are to be trusted 100% without scrutiny therefore any contradictory evidence is made up lies.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Vaspinne]

Oh no, I fully trust that this will be yet another moment to add to that long list of "got him! How will he wiggle out of this one? Oh he did? Alas" tweet or however it went

[Aerin]

Honestly, Trump could admit to doing all of it 100% and it wouldn't matter at all. There's no way 2/3 of the Senate votes him out, doesn't matter what he does. I'm more interested in if there will be any repercussions for the GOP senators in November because of it.