well that was almost something
well that was almost something
this is the holy roller rule, no? seems reasonable
What the fuck is going on lol
Herbert: I WAS IN!
Lmao
football lol
Well ok then.
What's the opposite of that crying in the rain gif AG always posts?
Herbert is an amazing QB but man, did the chargers get gifted some calls that last drive lol. There was at least 3-4 way more egregious DPI no calls before that one.
What a game lol
Herbert is going to be a scary dude once his balls drop.
I was at work so didn’t get to watch most of the game. But nice to see people joining me in the HERBERT hype train
Fun little chart showing all the starting running backs value to teams, and how much that value increases a teams win probability, in correlation to their contracts and the monetary value spent at the position.
Spoiler: show
The boys paying zeke $15m a year to add 1.5 losses to their season is something special.
Also, don't pay your running backs.
Weird that our ~#3 overall stat-wise undrafted FA rookie RB is costing us win probability.
Not sure the input variables are properly constrained here
i'm pretty sure they're using the "expected yards added" stat because i'm fairly certain that the athletic created that stat in the first place.
although you can take the information as seriously as you want since rb stats are so rough to determine in the first place... there's like 24 other reasons why that rb is doing well/poorly statistically that don't include the rbs own skills and abilities. for example: a pure goal line back is going to be vastly worse statistically than a rb that purely plays between the 20s because they have zero opportunity to increase their yards per carry and boxes are automatically going to be more stacked, which will automatically decrease their win rate
there's a million stats that try to parse all that shit out but it's still rough
also brees is playing this week