2022 NFL Week 3 Thread: I Wrote a Good Title but the Title Ain’t Write Back

[Koyangi]

dram tram

[Tyche]

Dolphins 100% getting slaughtered Thursday. Can't travel on a short week after that Bills game and play well.

[Weltall]

Bengals line is so bad that MIA still has a good chance.

[Tyche]

I don't think the defense is gonna do shit for Miami. Offense might, they only played about 30 seconds on Sunday.

[Rhyis.]

This was way further than 5 yards downfield though, so...

Dude...you said it was the definition of an illegal crack back. That play WAS NOT. Read the rules you just quoted. Jesus Christ. He did not hit him above the shoulders or below the waist. You claimed it was an illegal crack back. It was not. I told you that you didn't know what a crack back was. Now you've proved it. By the fucking rules you just posted. You just affirmed every single source I posted. Hitting between the shoulders and waist without launching with your helmet is not an illegal crack back block. You said it was. You were 100% wrong.

jesus christ, i can't be the only person that has watched football before

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOfIObhGMe0

i'm so sorry, apparently it's called a peel back block (it's literally the exact same thing except one is down the field and the other isn't). i called it a crack back block because i know it as a crack back block, and when i'm in the middle of a game talking about it i'm not googling sportsfeelgoodstories.com, i'm just watching the game... but whether you want to call it a peel back or a crackback block both are illegal when you hit them in the numbers. i know this because i watch fucking football and there's a million instance of receivers coming back to dbs, laying the wood on them, and getting flagged for it regardless of where they hit them... also because it says in the damn rules that all peel back blocks are illegal and all crackback blocks are illegal. it's literally the first fucking line in the rules.

All Crackback Blocks are illegal.

how you think you're right in any of this is absolutely astounding to me

verbatim the nfl says any use of either of them is fucking illegal. period.

[Koyangi]

Ladies, ladies...

[Tyche]

I posted about 6 sources and hilariously you mock the one with a funny name that is still 100% right lol. If you're mocking the name, you've lost here bud.

But hey, glad you're turning highlight heaven and ignoring very pertinent lines that you posted on the NFL site.

Play wasn't an illegal crack back or peel back. You said it was. You were wrong. By literally every source because you didn't know that a crack back had to be blindside or below the knees (unless launched leading with helmet, which is always illegal and not called a crack back)

[Tyche]

how you think you're right in any of this is absolutely astounding to me

verbatim the nfl says any use of either of them is fucking illegal. period.

I know, you idiot. I said as much. It. Was. Not. An. Illegal. Crack back.

To be called a crack back, it has to go above shoulders, or below knees .I said it wasn't an illegal crack back. You said it was because he ran back toward QB. You attempted.to explain that whole process.of why it's called a crack back. I said it wasn't, because it was not blindside.

How you don't get that you're the one who mistakingly called that an illegal crack back is beyond me.

[Rhyis.]

I posted about 6 sources and hilariously you mock the one with a funny name that is still 100% right lol. If you're mocking the name, you've lost here bud.

But hey, glad you're turning highlight heaven and ignoring very pertinent lines that you posted on the NFL site.

Play wasn't an illegal crack back or peel back. You said it was. You were wrong. By literally every source because you didn't know that a crack back had to be blindside or below the knees (unless launched leading with helmet, which is always illegal and not called a crack back)

The following is prohibited against a player who is the recipient of a Crackback Block:
a)Contacting him below the waist;
b)forcibly hitting his head or neck area with the helmet, facemask, forearm, or shoulder, even if the initial contact is lower than the player’s neck;
c)lowering the head and making forcible contact with any part of the helmet against any part of the defensive player’s body; or
d)illegally launching into him. It is an illegal launch if a player (i) leaves both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into his opponent

Learn. To. Read.

You don't need A, B, C, and D to apply here. only one of these is what defines it... it's anatomically impossible for both A&B to simultaneously apply.

Fuck me

[Tyche]

Post the rest of D you coward...you cropped a quote to fake being right lol. WHY'D YOU CUT THE QUOTE?!?

The and leads with his helmet part...

Because you knew you were wrong

[Rhyis.]

And then on top of this idiocy you're just going to calmly dismiss this very popular example of the shit that happened in the NFL that most people fucking know about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOfIObhGMe0

[Mertron]

i think the real crack back block is the friends we made along the way

[Xno Kappa]

[Cail]

i believe this is a hippa

lmao

[Xno Kappa]

https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/sta...RgB7KDCiRu02fw

RIP to his career. Dude always gave everything he had, never once complained, and was an outstanding locker room leader. Hopefully he retires before he destroys his body any further.

[Celeras]

Third fucking tackle on IR, shit is officially off the rails again.

G.Wilson is such a fucking STUD that it's hard to second guess anything.. just a shame.

https://twitter.com/FieldYates/statu...59485839036436

[6souls]

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...phins-facility

If Sunday's game has to be moved, it is likely the Bucs and Chiefs would play at a neutral site in the Midwest, such as Minneapolis (the Vikings play the New Orleans Saints in London in Week 4). Those plans remain fluid given the unknown path of the storm.

[Koyangi]

https://www.bluegartr.com/threads/13...cking-Football