Would you vote for him? I know I would vote for him especially if that bitch clinton was running against him.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... 4&refer=us
Would you vote for him? I know I would vote for him especially if that bitch clinton was running against him.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... 4&refer=us
I like him.
Hilary is more manly though IMHO.
Ruddy Giuliani... HELLO!!!! especially If hillary runs... I don't have the energy, I don't have the energy( If anyone here likes lewis black, you would get my post)
He needs to run.. because the republican outlook is very very bleak with names like John McCain floating around.
I played golf with his son about 5 years ago. Rudy is cool. His son is a spoiled little prick.
His son is an ass lol.Originally Posted by Bxbaby
As for Guiliani I never liked him all that much he made fireworks illegal.
I would without hesitation.
I sadly think that the only democrat that could beat a McCain or Guiliani would be another WASP-y dem - I think that Hilary or Obama or Feingold would get slaughtered, unfortunately.
Fuck Giuliani. McCain is a much better choice for GOP. Either way Republicans can fuck off
Could someone please tell me what Barack Obama has done that makes him a serious presidential candidate? A few years in state senate, a third of a term in US Senate, and a few pretty speeches. How does that qualify you to be president? He was endorsed by Oprah. Big whoop, so was James Frey and look how that turned out.Originally Posted by archibaldcrane
Someone please explain this to me? >_<
Ya know speaking of Obama, i read the article today in Time about how he could become the next president, but honestly, after thorough reading, I can't understand why he would be a plausible candidate. He's made no significant impact on anything yet, not to mention he's only been in government politics for a few years. Personally i just think he tells audiences what they want to hear in hopes to get people on his side, but that's just my opinion.
He's not Hillary.Originally Posted by Septimus
To be more specific, he has absolutely no baggage. Right now the powers that be of the democratic party are PRAYING that he can beat hilary in the primaries, because they know that Hillary will bring out the vote for the republican party. That would result in a loss of Congress definately and probably a loss of the presidency.
So they want someone with no baggage. Kerry has no chance, none of the current leaders of the democratic party are legit candidates due to too long of a voting record or too far out there in terms of ideology. Gore went off the deep end. So you've got Obama...nice guy, articulate, plays to the center but his ethincity will be enough to placate the left...and no baggage. Concede the South, play up the anti Bush sentiment in Ohio, and you have a democrat in the whitehouse. Honestly, I would probably vote for him over any potential republican candidate (including McCain...I don't understand how people don't understand that he's one of the most conservative republican senators...he's pretty brutal). I can't say the same for any other democratic candidate...of course, I voted libertarian in 04 (Michael Bradernik ftw).
The other not-Hillary candidate that's viable in a national election (as much as it pains me to say so) is John Edwards. That prick has his organization up and running, but I think he's been out of the public eye for too long. If he'd only been smart enough to not run in 04, both and NC would've been better off. Prick.
The real shame is that the democrats didn't make the decision to go conservative last race, because some of the new faces would have made nice national candidates if they'd had a couple of years in office, but no one's ever accused the current democratic party leadership of being smart politically (please don't point to this election...it took a pediophilia scandal to push the democrats to the win).
Originally Posted by Fero
Truely a great politican.
If H.Clinton and R.Guiliani run for office, its going to be one hell of a race and I really can't see how we can go wrong with any of them in office.
I'd vote for Hilary because her mind is in the right place.
It doesn't matter who he's running against, he has my vote. Fucking sharpton and hilary, fuck that.Originally Posted by Ryko
I'd vote for Hilary because her mind is in the right place.
Too bad thats the only thing in the right place with her.
Edit: fixed cause of retardation
The point about no baggage is well-said. It's very hard for long-time senators and reps to win the presidency nowadays, because they have voting records which are, no matter who you are or what you voted for or against, easy to attack. Governors are much easier because noone outside the state cares about how the state they ran ranked in education (Arkansas) or how many people they execute (Texas).
He's the closest to white blacks can get.Originally Posted by Septimus
Is this sarcasm? She's anti-video games, everyone here should be against her just based on thatOriginally Posted by Zigma
If Clinton runs as long the Repubs don't do something retarded like Cheney, the Repubs will keep the White House. Maybe Dems like her but like was stated above it'll bring Repubs out in force and I think everyone saw what happened last time that happened.
Rudy for president is a decent idea I think. He's probably one of the more respected names in the republican party by middle and left-minded people.
Obama I've seen as a candidate that could win it for the Dems...because it's not Hillary. You have to remember the majority of people who vote don't pay *that* much attention and might not even care if he has 30 years of experience or not in politics.
Uhh no need to beat around the bush, it's because he's BLACK.Originally Posted by Septimus