Bannable Offenses (updated 12/20/11) AND GENERAL READ THIS INFO (updated 8/20/14)

**Day** · 2009-06-12 20:50

Originally Posted by grantlogan

Seeing all the spam faggots cry is delishus. QQ moar.

Derogatory language in general.

This should be an infraction.

**Headspace** · 2009-06-12 20:52

Yup that's an infraction. Enforce it.

**Headspace** · 2009-06-12 20:56

Can we get bitching about text in Random Image Thread a bannable offense?

It's hard for me to read words about words.

**Shuemue** · 2009-06-12 21:13

Sometimes people in positions of 'power' do things they later regret.

Does this need to be one of those times?

**Beckwin** · 2009-06-12 22:17

name me one worthwhile thread that has been "killed" by the single post of "Darwinism".

correction stop being a cocksucker.

**Despain** · 2009-06-12 23:17

I don't understand how 'Darwinism' was even the last bit annoying, or a 'thread killer', but its whatever.

**zoobernut** · 2009-06-12 23:31

Yeah I am not quite sure how this particular one got so annoying that it became a thread killer.

**Cow_k** · 2009-06-12 23:43

In before people complaining about the rules of one internet message board in a sea of internet message boards.

I don't see why all the spam people don't just say "Thanks for all the fish" and fly off to some self-created board of spam paradise...

Instead they claim how much general sucks but continue reading it. You all act like BG is your home and without it you'd be tossed out in the streets alone and starving. Oh wait...

**Skjie** · 2009-06-12 23:44

Money

**Cow_k** · 2009-06-13 00:12

#1 There's an entire free-to-members board dedicated to people who don't want to follow other board's rules, yet there's always some inert need to spill out everywhere else for some reason. (attention whoring, plain stupidity?)

#2 Waaah my free sample isn't good enough. I want it to tailor fit me~ I swear, some people never get out of Grandma's basement.

I know your reasoning is correct, it's just stupid.

**Shuemue** · 2009-06-13 00:13

Look Cow_k, without us you'd still be reading KI and ZAM!

Is that really what you want?

**Skjie** · 2009-06-13 00:16

The other thing is a forum with no method of attracting new members dies very quickly. Spam needs the rest of BG as targets and also as a source of new members.

**Sonomaa** · 2009-06-13 00:16

talk to the mods, they asked for this one

**Cow_k** · 2009-06-13 00:17

As long as I still had Kaeko and Elmer, sure, why not.

**BarthelloSylph** · 2009-06-13 00:23

I am a big fan of the new Darwin rule. I think I've read 15 threads today and every single one had that in it, often multiple times. Well done mods.

**Shuemue** · 2009-06-13 00:27

Originally Posted by Sonomaa

talk to the mods, they asked for this one

yeah your mods have such a great track record when you let them think for themselves, don't they?

**Sonomaa** · 2009-06-13 00:48

you can leave if you dont like it.

**Beckwin** · 2009-06-13 00:59

Originally Posted by Cow_k

As long as I still had Kaeko and Elmer, sure, why not.

Elmer rarely posts in General and Kaeko virtually never does; sounds like you've "spilled out" of FFXI Discussion and are attention-whoring out here. something something grandma's basement.

And really, I want an examples of good threads "killed" by the one "Darwinism" post.

**Conrad** · 2009-06-13 01:16

Boy, I'm so glad we've cleared up all of the animosity and confusion regarding this ban, I know no one will ever wonder about the proper non-infractionable usage of the word again.

**Moridam** · 2009-06-13 01:18

i feel a distinct and pronounced lack of respect for bojangles 'round these parts the last day or so. what the fuck

Thread: Bannable Offenses (updated 12/20/11) AND GENERAL READ THIS INFO (updated 8/20/14)

Thread Tools

Latest Threads

Up & Coming Threads

Hottest Threads