Hey all,
The muse struck me with an idea recently that I want to see what your reaction to it is.
What if each zone had statically located points where if you traded the proper amount of beastman seals, one of the zone's NM's would spawn (so long as it is not already out). Each zone would have as many of these points as it has time/lottery spawn NM's and each point would spawn only one of the NM's. Now the amount needed to spawn an NM would be some function of either its level, rarity, etc, so that the price wouldn't be too cheap and therefore make the original spawns COMPLETELY obsolete.
Now, optionally, this could have an overbid system where each seal above the required minimum would increase the chances of rarer items dropping. Without overbidding, your just fighting the same NM that's time/lottery spawned. The value of each beastman seal above minimum would have to be looked into and might not have universal worth per spawn point. The overbid system could also be built to only effect Rare/Ex items so that this wouldn't become an easily abusable Golden Goose.
An implementation option to the overbid system would be that yes, you can trade more seals to improve your chances of getting an item, the NM also becomes more powerful. How much more powerful to how much more likely to get the good loot would need to be worked out and limits need to be set so that you couldn't spawn a level 145 Jaggedy-Eared Jack that would drop rabbit charm 100% of the time.
The NM would spawn claimed by whomever traded the seals so that no one else to opportunistically steal the spawn. Also, the actual list of which NM could be spawned this way may only be a subset of the lottery/time spawn as some just might be beyond ill-advisable (i.e. a point for Padfoot or Carmine Dobsonflies where all 4/10 of them spawned, all claimed by you, possibly juiced up, and seeking your demise? That could easily become... messy). But hey, this COULD be implemented for the HNM's and if so, would relieve the HNM scene greatly (OMG, relieve the HNM scene by giving them more chances to get what they want? HERESY!!!).
Now this idea is completely in the alpha stages and would require far more polish. Constructive criticism and feedback welcome and appreciated, flames are unfortunately expected and will be sloughed off accordingly.
Edit: took out a negation that made a confusing sentence ><.