+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,588
    BG Level
    6

    Time for BG help on some math regarding the complex number

    This thing just driving me mad. Let say that we have these two equations

    (875 + j300) X - (j1050) Y = 7580 + j 4375
    -50 X + (50-25j) Y = 0


    And both X and Y consist of real and complex number. Suppose the proper way to do it is
    expand the X and Y into

    X = real_x + imag_x * j
    Y = real_y + imag_y * j

    And substitute them into the equation, then solve by seperate the real and imaginary part.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------





    Ok, short story is, the solution I got from manual is

    X = 3.7866 + j4.9598
    Y = 1.0456 + j5.4812

    While using inverse matrix method with matlab giving this solution...

    X = 0.2746 + j0.8917
    Y = -3.3469 + j7.243


    Theoretically both solution seems to be correct (as approximation). But I just want to ask if anyone know the other way that will lead me to obtain the same solution as solution manual? (the first set of solution)

    Since this work is to confirm and making sure that the answer from solution manual is correct before giving away to student. However, even thought I know who are incharge on this problem, but it is impossible to get to him at any moment

  2. #2
    Love-God among men.
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,681
    BG Level
    7

    42

  3. #3

    Are you using j to repesent the square root of -1, also known as i? Your notation is confusing the shit out of me. A number in the set Z (set of complex numbers) is typically expressed as a + bi. I'm also at a loss as to why you used matrices to solve a simple substitution method two equations two unknowns problem.

    edit: On another note, solving two equations two unknowns doesn't produce "approximations." The numbers you find either work, or they don't. Then again, I can't check either of the answers provided as you haven't given us the real values of x and y.

  4. #4
    Sea Torques
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714
    BG Level
    5

    Every day, I wake up and thank god(s) that I'm not a mathematician

  5. #5
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    3,057
    BG Level
    7
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus
    WoW Realm
    Ravenholdt

    If you're using the EE way of solving the equations j stands for i = √-1 Then you can just use DeMoivre's Thereom to solve iirc.

  6. #6

    Oh, that sounds probable. My linear algebra class was extremely sub-par.

  7. #7
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,588
    BG Level
    6

    Quote Originally Posted by Blubbartron View Post
    Are you using j to repesent the square root of -1, also known as i? Your notation is confusing the shit out of me. A number in the set Z (set of complex numbers) is typically expressed as a + bi. I'm also at a loss as to why you used matrices to solve a simple substitution method two equations two unknowns problem.
    yea, j = i = square root of -1. It just comes across that this book is using j as complex number.

    edit: On another note, solving two equations two unknowns doesn't produce "approximations." The numbers you find either work, or they don't. Then again, I can't check either of the answers provided as you haven't given us the real values of x and y.
    the reason I was saying it is approximation is that there is still like 0.1~0.5% of error from those solutions >.>

    Quote Originally Posted by Korietsu View Post
    If you're using the EE way of solving the equations j stands for i = √-1 Then you can just use DeMoivre's Thereom to solve iirc.
    Thanks, I will look into this one

  8. #8

    inb4 aurik

  9. #9
    Radsourceful

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,964
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck

    Confirming the book on this one.

    -50 X + (50-25j) Y = 0
    X = (50-25j)*Y/50

    (875 + 300j)*(50-25j)*Y/50 - (1050j) Y = 7580 + 4375j
    (((875+300j)*(1-0.5j) - 1050j)*Y) = 7580 + 4375j
    (875-(875/2)j+300j-(300/2)(j^2)-1050j)*Y = 7580 + 4375j
    (1025-1187.5j)*Y = 7580 + 4375j

    At this point if I had to do it by hand I'd split it to real/imaginary parts but since you have matlab, just paste this in to confirm

    (7580 + 4375*sqrt(-1))/(1025-1187.5*sqrt(-1))

    ans = 1.0461 + 5.4802i = Y

    Substitute back in and

    (50-25j)*(1.0461 + 5.4802j)/50

    ans = 3.7862 + 4.9571i = X

    ...which doesn't match the book exactly, but much closer than the other solution - if I put your alternative numbers into the left sides of the original equations, I get

    (1) = (7.5779e+003 +4.3769e+003i) ok, this is close, but...
    (2) = (1.7764e-014 +4.0124e+002i) instead of 0

  10. #10
    Demosthenes11
    Guest

    thats just like solving a system of solutions
    aka
    3x-2y=2
    x+5y=7

    or something like that (that is, if im reading this correctly)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 2008-06-06, 11:15
  2. Looking for some help on my take-home exam
    By Tyr in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2006-11-30, 02:40
  3. Time for some relations!
    By Borisan in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 2005-08-22, 19:05
  4. Ouch, Call for help on Cassie{/comfort}
    By Deadkennedys in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2004-09-27, 07:48