Originally Posted by
Kuya
I think will just let it slide. This seems like one of those no end in sight arguments, and i'm having trouble taking it seriously. These arguments remind me of how Hume and Kant argued that causuality and contrast (among others) were "fundamental truths" in regards to the human brain/mind. Of course, Hume said that these were in the brain and they imposed themselves on reality (seeing causuality where there may be none) and Kant argued, much like you guys, that causuality is not in the brain, but rather it is a metaphysical and fundamental truth that governs reality.
I never really had a problem with what they said, so i suppose i shouldn't have a problem, but i never took it seriously either.