And you're stuck in the rabbit hole, not being able to look outside at the reality. Enjoy your magical world, but sciences and maths doesn't allow you to say the these things. You're confusing your dream of grandeur about the universe with the almost boring reality of mathematics and sciences.
I don't care what you believe, but the way you speak about it is annoying and unscientific. I'm always down for a philosophical discussion, but let's call it philo, not "evidence".
So, find me a fucking perfect circle in the nature. Find me a straigth line in the nature. Prove me that pi is indeed in the nature, and it's not simply a manifestation of our geometry.No, all I am saying is what a circle is.
You can change that value by changing what that circle is placed against, but even then you can note that changing the boundary conditions produces the same results we observe here.
There is no other hypothetical reality which is so different that there is no way you could have some semblance of mathematical truths.
The very requirement of being observable already places certain restrictions on the types of Universes that one could be said to exist within.
String Landscape models reinforce this in an odd manner.
Hell, prove me that if we could write a relational sentence using every entity in the universe, we would still need Pi and circle to explain it.