Originally Posted by
Byphareast
do you think lakshmi + garuda should be called garushmi or lakruda?
i like garushmi. ZhiGarushmi? ZhiLakruda?
Not gonna lie, this had me laughing a LOT harder at work than I should have. Bravo, rofl. For the record, I think it should be Garushmi as well. Lakruda sounds African :O
i find mnk ideal because of their high HP, high dmg output, counter, and abundance of abilities that doesnt trigger NMs lvl up. HF is extremely useful, especially when you're 6-manning it.
if you have a fairly large party then rng works fine too. have two rdm/nins stand apart from each other so taru NM will spend its time running back and forth, increasing the tank's survivability. rngs shoot it from the side. its a great and safe tactic.
im not going to argue on the SS part as both of us dont have concrete proof, but im inclined to think that maybe you missed it casting stoneskin.
The reason I say this is that it's not just all melee's hitting for 0. If one melee is engaged and doing full damage, and then another one shows up, they will start out hitting for 0's, while the other is hitting for full damage. Try it out next time you go, have one melee begin, HF even if you want to speed it up, then have the other melee go in and start. They will most likely hit for 0 to start.
rdm/nin's ability to easily keep hate off melees is because fomor NMs have low ceilings (or perhaps a super frequent hate clearance). have the rdm/nin cast ONLY dia and have your rngs go crazy and you'll see what i mean.
Hm, I'd have to test more into that. I seem to remember pulling hate on RNG and tanking it until I took some noticeable amount of damage before losing hate.
edit: actually, i think its that any type of magic has a higher enmity value than usual.