RECRUITING TRY HARDS
MUST BE ABLE TO PLAY HERO FROM PUSHER COMPOSITION
-RHASTA/CHEN/VENOMANCER/FURION/BROODMOTHER/DEATH PROPHET
-EARTH SHAKER (pretty much so they don't get it)
This is not about fucking around, this is about quick crushing people who will go shit like Riki/BH/Void/Sniper. We push hard and end by 20 minutes following the model. There are numerous VODs up about how to use this strat, watch them!
dole edit incase you cant tell we're serious:
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...4GihxBeyuXyfKw
Whenever I'm on, I'll play with you two like I usually do. If you guys are going full push I'll gladly go Rhasta, Death Prophet, ES, Pugna, whichever.
Edit: Holy crap, I knew Leshrac could push, but didn't think he was that effective, gonna play him some more.
I can play Pusher Veno pretty decently and with enough effort and time it could come to your standards.
Mouser for steamid here. You can just find me on the BG Forum group and add me from there since I have no idea what my original email address was for my account lol.
Try Clockwork / Furion / Enigma / Venomancer / Pugna
Enigma can create Eidolon from Furion treant. Venomancer ward is immune to magic. Pugna can clear creep faster you count to 5. Clockwork is used for fast Roshan and Rocket Flare can be used to push creep from different lane.
The strat is early Roshan. Push to Tier 2. Swap lane. Push to Tier 2. Swap lane. Push to rax.
Push to rax early is very ineffective because tier 3 tower hit pretty hard and your creep is too fragile to do any serious damage. You need to accumulated gold from towers on different lane to buy items to make them more effective.
Items:
1 Mek
2 Arcane boot
1 ring of basilius.
PS: Usually, I would delay the push until level 6 so everyone can get adequate level. Everyone would gather at mid and push straight to Rax. The other team would think we only want a mid tower. Suddenly, you are right outside the base raping their tower lol.
This team rolls three stunners and roam ganked, diving towers. We somehow manage a miracle comeback and start winning. But we can't break their base because of Silencer.
I tell this Clinkz "you know if you got a try hard hero we probably would have won"
He says "i know, but i don't like trying hard" and dc's
Why the fuck are people like this in the game?
I wanna play with you guys' Gred!
In other news I'm loving playing some Naix Jungle
wow, those guys should have wiped the floor with you..
But i wiped the floor with them! (They weren't very good)
This is how you tryhard.
I enjoy the thread name change haha
Man I gotta get into playing this more. lol
ggggggg. 2 ragequits makes tryhardicus maximus happi
http://kotaku.com/5883938/blizzard-is-suing-valve
Blizzard and Valve go to War Over DOTA Name
Blizzard once made a game called WarCraft III. Then someone made an awesome mod for it called DOTA. Then Valve decided to make a game called DOTA 2. Then Blizzard decided to make something called Blizzard DOTA.
And now Blizzard is fighting a legal battle with Valve over the whole thing. What a mess.
Two of the most successful and popular PC developers of all time are squaring off in court over the use of the term DOTA, which stands for Defence of the Ancients.
In 2010, Valve - who is working on a successor to the original called DOTA 2 - began attempts to trademark the word "DOTA", despite the fact it had no historical connection to the property or the genre. At the time, Blizzard said some unkind things publicly about the move, but didn't seem to take things any further.
It has now.
Arguing before the US Patent and Trademark Office's Trial and Appeal Board in an attempt to have Valve's trademark application blocked, Blizzard says that, because the term DOTA has been used by the company's games and fans for seven years, "the DOTA mark has become firmly associated in the mind of consumers with Blizzard".
Valve, on the other hand, well...here's what Blizzard has to say about Valve's upcoming DOTA 2:
Getting into the fine print, Blizzard says that, because the original DOTA required WarCraft III to play - and because it's been using and licensing the term to other companies - that while it doesn't have a trademark on the term, it's got a better case for one than Valve.In contrast to Blizzard, Applicant Valve Corporation ("Valve") has never used the mark DOTA in connection with any product or service that currently is available to the public. By attempting to register the mark DOTA, Valve seeks to appropriate the more than seven years of goodwill that Blizzard has developed in the mark DOTA and in
its Warcraft III computer game and take for itself a name that has come to signify the product of years of time and energy expended by Blizzard and by fans of Warcraft III. Valve has no right to the registration it seeks. If such registration is issued, it not only will damage Blizzard, but also the legions of Blizzard fans that have worked for years
with Blizzard and its products, including by causing consumers to falsely believe that Valve's products are affiliated, sponsored or endorsed by Blizzard and are related or connected to Warcraft III.
In a filing dated November 16, 2011, Blizzard wrote that it "respectfully requests that this Opposition be granted" to Valve's attempts to trademark DOTA (and "Defense of the Ancients", and "DotA", and "Dota").
waaah we didnt come up with this idea first
I wrote an article for EG explaining the trademark dispute briefly, I'll probably release an update now that Blizzard has waded in: http://myeg.net/team/the-battle-behind-a-name/
Also