I won't argue for cure V or against in this post; the objective here to explain in what ways your argument is flawed.
So according to you, the amount cured is irrelevant in assessing how well one cures. Got it. Lets replace all cures with Regens then. Same MP cost and amount cured, but you get to wait 50s before it finishes curing. It's still the same though!
Strawman arguments (WAR/WHM) are what makes the argument worthless, not the point itself. BLM/RDM accesses all the Cure potency gear that RDM does and even more than SCH does. Their argument cannot be that other classes are superior to RDM and SCH for healing; however, it can be that they perform functions external to healing that diminishes the value of their healing and compromises their slot in the PT.
Hint: Moral language undermines your argument. The fact that Cure IV means I have to cure myself 4-5x on RDM after convert, an ability that people have come to accept as a technique that replenishes MP for the purpose of instantly returning to normal functions, can be construed as "wrong" since it undermines the design of my other abilities.That being said, there's absolutely nothing wrong with a SCH or RDM being limited to Cure4.
That assumes accession is always available, which it is not. You might counter that Agas also have recast and if stratagems are available, you may readily aga faster than the WHM. However, to then make this counterargument would be to be ignore the negative effect of utilizing accession (Double/Triple recast time).WHM is not necessarily a better AoE healer either thanks to the availability of Accession.
How does this demonstrate that RDM and SCH should not receive higher tier cures? What's interesting to note is that you've exhausted almost all the cure potency gear available (Minus Roundel + Even less significant pieces). Moreover, BLM and BRD have access to these pieces.If you're in a situation where you're main-healing on either of those jobs, perhaps you should rethink your priority system and actually go and acquire gear that enhances your Cure Potency, like Serpentes set, Augur's Gloves, Surya's Staff +1.
This assumes several things. It assumes melees aren't already maximizing their kill speed. It assumes enmity gear will make a difference (The outcome might be the same with or without enmity-50). Level WHM cannot be countered because it's already an irrational statement. The premise you've given (It's not hard to do) is applicable to any class in Abyssea, so there is no logical "arrow" that points us to the conclusion that we must level WHM. Even if you revised this to say "Well, the premise is that you want to be an effective healer", it only points to leveling WHM if you close the possibility of class change (i.e. updates).If you're too concerned about taking hate throwing out Accession Cure4s when fighting stuff, tell your melee to suck less and kill shit faster, or invest in enmity gear, or better yet... consider leveling WHM - it's not like its hard to do so now that its a decent mage job to have leveled and in groups.
This statement does nothing to suggest that RDM or SCH should not get cure V, and in fact, lends support for the notion that they should if you believe that these classes should be just as or more efficient than their healing capacities.Or maybe you could just be more efficient on either of those jobs, and nuke mobs to shit with them. Thanks to the addition of Atma, it's not only worthwhile to do so, it makes things more efficient in general.
XI Wiki



