Guartz, your arguments are usually laughable and pathetic but you're outdoing yourself lately.
First off, this book not meeting the criteria to be illegal despite the first amendment isn't a loophole. It anything, the incitement test is itself a loophole in the first amendment.
Second, these rules were conjured out of thin air by a handful of people and imposed upon millions, yet you claim this is not contradictory to a political philosophy which argues against authoritarianism and government.
Third, you fail to realize that by hiding behind compartmentalization and vituperous intolerance you are the very embodiment of the stereotypically immature anarchist which you accuse Senoska of making a strawman out of.
XI Wiki


