it worked on this side
it worked on this side
http://3mb.us/images/292_1263173327483.gif
Does this work?
yeah
Picked a good angle - the one missing this:
http://assets.espn.go.com/sportscent...aceMask_01.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esqRN...eature=related
I especially love the first comment
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/P...rs-game-091210
.sigh
Don't know why I waste my time.
I'll take the word of Mike Pereira over some dumb football fan who knowledge is limited to what he hears over a telecast
I don't have the patience to go back and find where you said otherwise, but I can't believe anyone could call that a non-catch. retarded rule is retarded
just because it's a rule doesn't mean you didn't get beat
Do you read what you type before you press enter? I don't think you do.
BEARS
Demos, I think what you're looking here is "should've" gotten beat. The Bears didn't keep Johnson from scoring the game-winning TD, he chose to drop the ball a half-second before the play was "over" technically.
the lions won that game. they caught a TD with 20 seconds left in the endzone that put them ahead. a technicality changed that. was it the correct call? probably, but that doesnt change the fact that he caught the ball to win the game. he got excited and dropped the ball getting up. I don't see how the bears "won" that game