You might be right. They probably practiced a lot in WW2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leRsWGF3mSc
Okaay, /end derail >_>!
I don't know that policing/peace-keeping is necesarily something most armies do; more often than not, it seems to come after-the-fact and maybe something "unique" to afew western militaries given how they're used.
Yep. Richard Engel was just on MSNBC, stating that the pro-Mubarak thugs in their buses were allowed to go through military checkpoints, without even slowing. Let alone being frisked for weapons.
No, AJ HQ is in Qatar, and they are major enough that servers are likely spread wide and well handled.
DDoS maybe, but more likely it's just people like uss trying to watch. AJE has been the #1 reportage for this whole thing, CNN is USELESS.
And while Reuters, The Guardian, & NYT's The Lede blogs have been accurate, they're a bit slower than AJE.
http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/
That above is the Al Jazeera English vid addy, there are others too right below the video pane on the page.
It is odd seeing ppl in lines ripping apart the cement right now, putting the blocks into cloth and carrying them off to use them in battle.
http://twitter.com/#!/stevebruskCNN/...89765552087040
Need more gay bashing by muslims.
CNN is this middling, unsatisfying, useless thing. CNN International however, is infinitely better.
And it's likely not a a DDoS (who would, besides certain governments?), but rather their inability to simply handle the fuckload of influx of people trying to get information/video. AJ has certainly risen to prominence throughout these uprisings, so this isn't really surprising.
Oh snap pro supporters broke through?
Shots fired.. aw hell.
Yea Edelweiss, I kind of have been sticking to news sources I can trust and following that with the links from the twitter lists. CNN is not much better than Fox imo.
If you consider that AJ eng has to perform like ninjas in order to get reports and still refuse to stop working after being arrested and having their shit seized, I admire them the most. Democracy now also has good info. As for major networks, as long as Richard Engel is saying things, knowing his background and his knowledge of the culture and language with a close relation to the people, I trust him.
its partially the fault of US cable providers who refuse to carry Al Jazeera English so you can only get it in DC or Vermont. Seems like whenever something goes down in the Middle East they are the ones with the best reporting. In 2009 they were the only ones allowed to film in Gaza too iirc.
It sickens me that the government doesn't step up and support people wanting to change their country. Isn't that how we were founded?
Just sayin'.
CNN only did that b/c they are cohosting a debate w/ the Tea Party for ratings so they need to solidify the partnership...
Speaking of...It might help if it wasn't retardedly percieved to be some terrorist news network, in the US. Seriously.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/0..._n_817404.html
Seems a bit ironic coming from a FOX News anchor.
Colmes said that the distinction between a channel and its guests was an important one, and that Al Jazeera has been a thorn in the side of Arab governments across the Middle East.
Buildings on fire now around the square. On Sky news they're saying Mubarak bussed in people who they paid and gave a meal to cause trouble.
It is and I watch only on the internet. It doesn't help when you have people calling AJaz a pro Hamas terrorist tv network. My only issue with Al Jaz is the programs can be downright depressing at times like Democracy Now.
I don't always like to bust out bawling my eyes out while trying to eat my dinner and watching it. It is an exercise in education to be used to the censorship of US mainstream news and then go to AJaz and see long shots of corpses and violent carnage with no warnings before hand.
It is good to have a choice and I choose the real shit, as long as I have the button to shut it off if its not a good time for me to cry.
Looks like Elbaradei [mispelled] has issued a statement to both sides of the protest along with US State Dept and the UN.
More reports that the violence had been orchestrated by the authorities to stop the protest. Of course I do not know wtf kind of logic they are using when these protesters fearlessly faced abusive riot police wielding weapons and teargas.
I think it's probably more accurate to really say that the violence was stirred up to precipitate (and justify) a government crackdown..atleast to the few supporters the government has left. Virtually everyone, and history itself, already knows that it's all a load of bullshit.
*Revealing truth is utterly appauling by nature of what it reveals, I guess Mistress.
People are throwing molotovs at eachother and now there are firehoses being sprayed at people lol.
I'm sure this is true for a handful, however I suspect that the rather comparitively small group (roughly a thousand?) that Mubarak's political party/government could muster are really just the die-hards, police, etc. in plain clothes. Though with the grueling poverty in Egypt, i'm sure a meal is a serious motivator for someone who doesn't strongly feel for the revolutionaries.