Sometimes Plow does make sense, unlike Cowherd, who never makes sense.
Sometimes Plow does make sense, unlike Cowherd, who never makes sense.
Pretty excited about Mallett, that pick makes me kind of think. Our current back-up wasn't that bad to begin with.
Maybe. Do you think the Packers would have been 13-3 and in overtime of the NFC championship his 3rd year in the league? Cuz they were with him sitting.
The reality is that until recently, young starters were the exception to the rule. Like I said it was your Elways, your Aikmans, etc.
You look at the 49'ers that were great teams for 2 solid decades, they groomed Montana with a fair bit of playing but not starting early on. He got older, they picked up Steve Young... who was a horribly failed experiment as a first year starter. He sat for 4 years behind Montana, as a very solid backup, then took over and became a HoF'er. Young got older, they picked up Garcia, who'd been playing in Canada for 5 years. He gave them another 5 years of excellence.
All of that ended when the strategy finally failed with Rattay.
Yeah, so much has changed, but I'm a firm believer in 'toss them to the wolves and let them learn on their own' if they aren't on a completely horrendous team, like the Lions, or the Browns.. or one of the other bottom feeder teams out there.
It's also important that you get thrown on a team with a stable coaching staff and a stable system. Get guys like Jason Campbell, who I truly believe is a serviceable QB and give him the same staff yearly, I guarantee he'd be way better than he is now. Guy just couldn't catch a break and be with the same system longer than a year. It's all very situational in that regard. Sometimes you get lucky, like Sam Bradford, and get to play in a lousy division to get your bearings. Or sometimes you get unlucky.. and you're David Carr, behind one of the worst lines ever, getting sacked 70+ times.
QB is just a crapshoot in the draft D:
But, you know, Rhinox is right.
Clearly the best strategy is to wait until your current qb is gone, and then worry about the future of the franchise.
It's worked out so well for so long for the Browns, Bills, Dolphins, Chiefs, Seahawks, Raiders, Panthers, etc.
Rofl
The Bengals' reluctance to draft a serviceable potential future qb looks like it's really going to pay off, too.
sleep time, enjoy the retarded discussion
If that's the criteria, then your claim is utterly and completely destroyed by Rodgers' existence. He's obviously not a terrible quarterback, and he's obviously not under terrible coaches.
It's that simple, your statement is flat out wrong on those grounds alone.
If you really want to be that specific, you're just making yourself more specifically wrong.
you can't be stupid enough to have gotten whooshed by that
there's no fucking way I'm talking to someone stupid enough to have gotten whooshed by that
Oh, and they can't have played before, and they can't have sat out for other reasons, and they have to be qb's you like, and between 6'4-6'4 and 3/4 with blue eyes and black hair and
yeah, sorry, I just keep going from
there's no way you can be any more retarded than this
to
ok, now there's really no way you can be any more retarded
and then again to
no, really, from now on you cannot humanly possibly prove yourself to be any stupider than you already have
and so on and so forth