Page 25 of 30 FirstFirst ... 15 23 24 25 26 27 ... LastLast
Results 481 to 500 of 586
  1. #481
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,453
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Fallaci Isalie
    FFXIV Server
    Ultros
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Quote Originally Posted by Insanecyclone View Post
    I'm not a PVP person, so the PVE ones are less populated? Also Standard on sale for $7.49 and Collector's $9.99 on steam for daily.
    Well I've only been on 1 PvE server and 1 PvP server. The difference is noticeable, but the PvE server I'm on as always been a "medium" populated server. There are definitely PvE servers that are populated as well. Just need to go down the list and find one

  2. #482
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,796
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Quote Originally Posted by Raen Ryong View Post
    -damagetaken% has increasing returns though, such that combined with other Riftstalker damage reductions you are getting ~-3% damage taken from the last point of Bolster working against both physical and magical, whereas Parry is physical only and luck based (where reliable mitigation > luck-based mitigation). This is why I've always preferred the 8ranger.

    I don't see the need to rearrange the off-GCDs still though; if I want to use Phantom Blow in the example above, I double tap. If I don't want to use Phantom Blow and just want to use my reactive (for whatever reason) I singletap. Similarly if you wanted to use Phantom Blow, you'd singletap and double tap for your reactive.

    The question becomes when would you want to only use one without the other? In either case you have reactives and normals flying off around each other and in neither case do you waste GCDs (the only time this would happen is on the first button press of the fight ... but there are no reactives then). In either case you are, for want of a better term, mashing buttons. I don't think I'm articulating very well.
    I won't deny that the overall returns from an extra point in Bolster would outweight the slightly extra threat from another Strike Back from the BD tree or that 51pt ability, StS. So long as you don't keep using StS, that extra mitigation does outweight the 5% dodge from False Blade as well as decreases chance to hit back enemies.

    However, the offGCDs is something I prefer. Then again, I smash my keys as well.

    The only reason -dmg taken% has increasing returns is how simple Rift's method of calculating dmg is. We're just so accustomed to FFXI that seeing something simple has boggled our minds...

  3. #483
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,933
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Serefina Solfyre
    FFXIV Server
    Odin
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    Quote Originally Posted by Khalil View Post
    The only reason -dmg taken% has increasing returns is how simple Rift's method of calculating dmg is. We're just so accustomed to FFXI that seeing something simple has boggled our minds...
    I wouldn't say it's comparatively simple so much as straightforward. Both go through the same process, ie

    Enemy damage starts here => chance of x event! => (1 - xevent%)damage => chance of y event! => (1 - yevent%)damage => etc right to the end. FFXI just wasn't nice enough to come out and tell us how it all worked

  4. #484
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,796
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    So, I did a quick little mitigation check from gaining 2% from Bolster and without on all of our attacks; physical, non-physical and magical.

    So, quick run down of our mitigation; 6% damage taken from Phantom Blow, 6% damage taken from Exceptional Resilience, 15% physical damage taken from Shadow Guard, 5% non-physical damage taken from Improved Guardian Phase. Finally, 35% from Rift Guard. My math does not include Deflect but I can add in later.

    This is with a 59% reduction from armor; 1-[(1-0.59)(1-0.33)(1-0.35)] = 82.14% mitigation from physical.
    Now, let's try it with only 4% from Bolster; 1-[(1-0.59)(1-0.31)(1-0.35)] = 81.61% mitigation from physical.

    Using the same method for non-physical and magical, we end with the following;

    With 6% from Bolster; 46.7% mitigation from magical.
    With 4% from Bolster; 45.4% mitigation from magical.

    With 6% from Bolster; 49.9% mitigation from non-physical.
    With 4% from Bolster; 48.6% mitigation from non-physical.

    The difference in %mitigation are small, however given a long fight such as Akylios, and the benefits will sharply contrast those with the last point in Bolster. That being said, with putting 7pts in BD, you lose out on 5% extra Dodge.

  5. #485
    Nidhogg
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    3,933
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Serefina Solfyre
    FFXIV Server
    Odin
    FFXI Server
    Bahamut

    You do yeah; 8BD is better vs pure physical opponents and 8Rng vs those who use magic. Our tanking experiences likely vary in that I haven't tanked any of Hammerknell due to having no guild that raids at a convenient time for me, so my tanking was largely in the RoS/GSB/DH/GP (and lolT2s but yeah) areas, where Greenscale and Herald were my main "big targets", where obviously I valued the mixed mitigation one a little bit more.

    It could be a bad choice, but I remember going through all of the math behind it and finding it quite sound.

    If you do HK mainly which is largely physical (or so I'm lead to believe?) then I can definitely see 8BD becoming more and more useful.

  6. #486
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,796
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Quote Originally Posted by Raen Ryong View Post
    You do yeah; 8BD is better vs pure physical opponents and 8Rng vs those who use magic. Our tanking experiences likely vary in that I haven't tanked any of Hammerknell due to having no guild that raids at a convenient time for me, so my tanking was largely in the RoS/GSB/DH/GP (and lolT2s but yeah) areas, where Greenscale and Herald were my main "big targets", where obviously I valued the mixed mitigation one a little bit more.

    It could be a bad choice, but I remember going through all of the math behind it and finding it quite sound.

    If you do HK mainly which is largely physical (or so I'm lead to believe?) then I can definitely see 8BD becoming more and more useful.
    The lower floor is mainly filled with physical with some abilities magical or non-physical. The upper floor, however, is a mixture of both. With the 1.6 changes and our Shadow Guard working as intended, we can pretty much tank any boss in HK. However, the Lashers from Akylios still hit like a truck, around 7-8k after mitigation and without deflect. Jornaru, himself, hits just below the Lashers...

    In HK, Warriors excel at it while Rogues/Justicars fight for the leftovers. That isn't to say we suck, they're just way better than us, lol.

  7. #487
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,826
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Quote Originally Posted by Insanecyclone View Post
    I'm not a PVP person, so the PVE ones are less populated? Also Standard on sale for $7.49 and Collector's $9.99 on steam for daily.
    Populations overall are good. The biggest issue i've seen is people geared for Hammerknell to replace your normal attrition of people who got spoiled by lolwow difficulty and the last boss slaps you with a debuff making your tanks needing more toughness and everyone else more hit so they can actually hit the boss.

  8. #488

    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,355
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Fun akylios tip, challenge someone to a duel, and have one of them jump into the water before engaging jornaru. The debuff goes away, not sure if it's been patched yet but my old guild was doing that to figure out the mechanics. Good luck

  9. #489
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,453
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Fallaci Isalie
    FFXIV Server
    Ultros
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    1 month bump here we go!

    Got some new guys in the guild, Darktide being lame as always during P2 on the melee side. For the pulls we've always had a BM pet pull with the tank there and the rest of the raid LoS'ed behind a rock. Typically it works pretty well, but last night there were like 50 million deaths. I wasn't on the melee side to get a clear idea what was going on, but just got me thinking if there is a fool-proof way of pulling that side that doesn't lead to clerics getting all 4 spawns to charge at them?

  10. #490

    Sweaty Dick Punching Enthusiast

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    9,355
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Leviathan

    Stack on the tank.

  11. #491
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,826
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Found an interesting way to not get adds on the melee side. WOTM bugs it so the mob will aggro, but so long as no one is near the warrior pulling, no adds will come.

  12. #492
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,453
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Fallaci Isalie
    FFXIV Server
    Ultros
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Quote Originally Posted by Melena View Post
    Found an interesting way to not get adds on the melee side. WOTM bugs it so the mob will aggro, but so long as no one is near the warrior pulling, no adds will come.
    What can't WOTM do >_>

  13. #493
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,826
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Yea no shit. It let me solo that annoying mob in KB I believe for the epic quest line. Let him rape the rest of my party then promptly solo'd him over the next 5 minutes.

  14. #494
    BG Staff
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    27,188
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    So what shard is everyone on? Bought it today, applying patch atm.

  15. #495
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    1,453
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Fallaci Isalie
    FFXIV Server
    Ultros
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    Belmont. My sig lies

  16. #496
    Tyven's Xbax Fren
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,736
    BG Level
    6
    WoW Realm
    Korgath

    Seastone, guardian side. If I had enough time to start a new character I'd do defiant though.

  17. #497
    Member since 2006 and still can't think of a title.
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    28,826
    BG Level
    10
    FFXIV Character
    Acanis Lindri
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Bismarck
    WoW Realm
    Kil'jaeden

    Byriel Guardian side but our guild is contemplating a server hop to a more populated server if this merger falls through.

  18. #498
    BG Staff
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    27,188
    BG Level
    10
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Have a 2 guys on Greybriar, Mezraq Guardian, and Sagohzo Defiant.

  19. #499
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,282
    BG Level
    6
    FFXI Server
    Quetzalcoatl
    WoW Realm
    Garona

    Anybody playing this game anymore? The 1.5 stuff looks very interesting. Sorry, I haven't followed it lately but it caught my eye again.

  20. #500
    Certified Enhancement Shaman
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,872
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Meph Taru
    FFXIV Server
    Diabolos

    1.5? 1.7 is about to hit lol

Page 25 of 30 FirstFirst ... 15 23 24 25 26 27 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Aion: Random Question Thread
    By Falisa in forum MMORPGs
    Replies: 1971
    Last Post: 2012-08-26, 08:31