Thank you, Captain Obvious.
I think I need to start tagging all of my posts with /sarcasm like for real.
These people are only outraged because it was caught on tape and they don't like the look of the person doing it. If it had been the cemetery groundskeeper picking it up to throw it away like everything else that gets left in the cemetery, there would have been no fucks given. What's the difference between throwing shit away after some amount of time, and someone "stealing" it before it gets thrown away? Do they really expect everything they leave at the grave to be there forever?
Shit's fucking stupid.
I think the problem is it was left there only a few hours before hand.
I would assume they know that crews throw items away, but its usually not after 4 hours of it being there.
I skimmed it. I stand by my opinion that these people are retarded if they think stuff they leave at a grave should linger there forever. It's abandoned property, exposed to the elements and wildlife. They have retarded-level unreasonable expectations of what can/should happen.
Better this woman "steal" the stuffed animal to presumably give to a living, breathing child than let it sit there getting more and more disgusting over time.
I can't imagine losing a child, or a baby even... so I know I, like I'm sure all of you, am unqualified to speak on how I would deal with it, but examining it the best i can, I have to actually agree with Blubbartron even if it sounds heartless. The child should be mourned by their parents, loved ones because Its incredibly sad to lose an infant or child who never got the chance at life... but that said, based on your beliefs the child has moved on, either to blanket nothingness or a cloud somewhere, either way he doesn't need stuffed animals cause he's either happily in heaven or isn't aware of existence. I know most burial things are there for the living to feel better/move on, not for the deceased, that isn't lost on me.
I don't want to say the parents shouldn't mourn in their own way, even if it means bringing the child toys, but in the end all those toys are either destroyed/carried off by wildlife or thrown away after some time by a groundskeeper. At least this way the toys go to make some living children happy perhaps by a parent who can't afford to make their children happy, and in the end, if i were dead and my parents left me toys or such, I would not mind one bit, and in fact would be more happy, if someone took them to make another childs life happier and better, and I would hope my parents and loved ones would understand that.
(This is all assuming she is less fortunate and she's not selling them, if she is selling them, I'd need to know why shes selling them to make judgment)
I crashed my car into a grave one time, what does that mean for me? Was a newly buried baby... hows that for a creep factor.
![]()
I don't know, personally I'd be creeped out that it came from a graveyard. While I agree with the concept in theory, I'm sorry, I am not afraid to admit that I'm afraid of the supernatural and that would just be uncool.
I'm sure the baby will come haunt her and take it back.
Maybe! lol
Shits fucking retarded, they paid for that plot so they could mourn the loss of a loved one, not so some fat bitch could stroll by and ruin the way they mourn their child. I'd be in an absolute uprage too if someone was ruining the way I mourned by stealing something only 4 hours after I placed it there. I get that all items will be tossed eventually, but that's unreal.
Might as well just stop by a graveyard on my way to my next date and pick up some flowers, right?
http://fox2now.com/2014/04/24/caught...m-babys-grave/
She turned herself in btw. Says
Also far be it for me to judge how someone mourns their loved ones, but I think my loved ones live on in my heart and my memory, not a FisherPrice™ Toy set from Target. Plus as i described earlier, I'm not a selfish person, If that women had stolen it to give to her children because she couldn't afford it? I'm fucking dead, give it to the living child so he could be happy for a change. Thats me though.she said she saw a loos dog wandering on the property. She lifted the stuffed animal to keep the dog from destroying it. Shade was served a summons for petty theft
If they're still mourning after 7 years, they need to see a therapist. Everybody deals with grief at their own pace, but it's pretty well accepted that a person shouldn't be taking nearly a decade to come to terms. Visiting the grave site of dead loved ones on a daily basis, years after they've died, is not healthy.
Losing a child is different then losing any other type of loved one, especially if the child lost turns out to be the only one you were able to have.
Therapy won't fix the grieving, if the parents are emotionally unable to live on a daily basis due to this 7 years later then yes that's a issue.
If they are having problems on a holiday, day of child's birth or the day of child's death then no time or no therapy will ever fix that.