moved the gun stuff to the gun thread. I am a lazy admin.
moved the gun stuff to the gun thread. I am a lazy admin.
I guess he never saw that coming
Don't shoot your neighbor's dinosaur:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...=NYDailyNewsTw
owned by squatters' rights: http://www.kptv.com/story/26343399/m...autostart=true
PORTLAND, OR (KPTV) -
A Washington man who recently closed on a home in Northeast Portland was shocked to find a family had recently moved in and changed the locks.
Rod Nylund said he learned about the occupants, who he assumes are squatters, last week when a contractor he sent to do work at the home called to tell him it was occupied. Nylund called police and confronted the occupants, but said the officer was unable to do anything about it.
Nylund said his realtor found out the couple had not only changed the locks, but started utility service at the home in their names.
"It's kind of like buying a car and you walk out to get in it and somebody's sitting in there," said Nylund.
Nylund's realtor, Kim Spiess, said the home's previous owner has no idea who is currently living in the home, or how they got there.
Neighbors, who asked not to be identified, said they noticed the couple had recently moved into the home, which is near NE 170th and Glisan, after it had been standing vacant for several months.
Nylund said he has tried to communicate with the occupants, even offering them money to move out, but has had no luck.
"These people are pretty sharp," said Nylund. "They turned the power on 30 days prior to moving into it, and they paid the power bill while the home was vacant."
Gresham police confirmed an officer responded to a call for squatters at the residence, but could not provide details on the outcome of the response.
The home's occupants answered a knock on the door Thursday, but would not comment about the situation.
According to John Henry Hingson, a Portland-area attorney, Nylund will have to go to court to remove the home's current occupants by filing a forcible entry and detainer action.
Nylund said he will be contacting his own attorney to try to claim his property
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5704473.htmlA Virginia couple turned their teen daughter in to local police after they discovered she was exchanging racy images on her electronic devices.
The girl, who is 13, had been using her phone to send nude photos of herself to boys, the parents said.
"Looking through the phone and the tablet we did find sexual pictures, conversations that were very inappropriate for her age," the mother of the girl told WTVR. Her name has been withheld to protect her daughter's identity. "Everybody wanted to be her friend, because according to these people, she was cool now."
The mom said that the girl received messages from at least one boy who appeared to be in his late teens asking if she wanted to have sex. That led them to contact the Dinwiddie County Sheriff's Office. They took her daughter to the station and turned her over for questioning.
Police say that they're investigating the case. The boy who sent the messages is believed to be a senior at an area high school. Depending on his age, that could mean felony charges, but prosecutors said that there are other options available. The girl may also face charges.
Commonwealth Attorney Lisa Caruso said that in such cases, juveniles are sometimes ordered to enter a 12-week program, consisting of group classes. "The parents would get involved [and] there would be some counseling," she said.
The middle-schooler's parents confiscated their daughter's electronic devices.
Nice. You just ruined your daughter's life.
Pretty sure protecting your daughter from any and all creepy assholes who will prey on her is not ruining her life. There's nothing about her having been arrested, so I fail to see how the parents are ruining her life.
The fact that you don't see anything wrong with a 13 year old girl being exploited into sending nude pictures is actually pretty disturbing.
I think it is cause it will follow her the rest of her life. The article says she may face charges. They should have handled this a different way and not give their daughter a criminal record. Like.. oh I don't know.. talking to her about it and why she shouldn't do it and then ground her dumb ass and take away her phone and ipad.
What the hell makes you think I don't see anything wrong with it? O_o
If the police want to (they likely won't, unless she refuses to cooperate with them as they try to prosecute her friends), they could charge her with creating and distributing child pornography. There's precedent for doing that. That would certainly ruin her life, even though she will be socially ostracized regardless of what happens now. 13 is a tad on the young age to be experimenting sexually, but it's not unheard of, and it's not outrageous.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that I'm pretty sure the girl wasn't the one whose idea it was to take nudes of herself and send them. At least not the first time it happened, certainly after getting attention from it the first time she agreed to do it, she realized that that's the way to get the boys to like her and may have initiated it with others.
It's a juvie record so shouldn't they should be sealed anyway? It's a shame that young girls think the only way to get guys to like them is to take their clothes off.
Is this how you got pregnant, aks?
Right, I'm 33 years old with a 10 year old and an 8 year old, I totally got pregnant by sending nude text messages to boys when I was 13, before the internet and cell phones even existed.
Try again, ass.
That'll teach her.
why is aks so butthurt, you don't get pregnant from anal
Butthurt? I just don't see what's so bad about the parents intervening from what is a dangerous path for this girl to go down.
Maybe it's the only thing she's got left. Did you ever think of that, you insensitive jerkbert!
shit, I'm sorry