ITT: Sexual harassment is justified sometimes ... ever ...
(Hint: no, it's fucking not.)
ITT: Sexual harassment is justified sometimes ... ever ...
(Hint: no, it's fucking not.)
Those kind of replies are expected tbh Wop was probably some trust fund baby dickwad that acts exactly like 99% of those in that bubble of privilege.
Isn't blubb the guy who posts in the feminism thread all day about how bad feminism is?
Yeah, pretty much.
wop wanted someone to shop the woman so she looked like ms piggy so he and some work buddies could use it as a dartboard. the photo he posted to be shopped was linked directly from her facebook page. someone decided that this undeniably unprofessional behavior should be brought to the attention of the woman in question. wop threatened legal action against BG, which is always an instant permaban.
thats literally everything that matters about that story.
except that it was funny as hell
Basically, wop got mad that someone other than him was using an advantage they were born into.
Hint: it wasn't about sexual harassment. It was about her using sex to advance her career beyond her capability/at the expense of others, and them being upset by it. Her *BOSSES*, giving her those favors in exchange for sex (unless, y'know, she sexed them up, and then demanded favors or she'd go to their wives), is sexual harassment. Wop wanting to throw darts at her for her getting promoted beyond her work-pace merit is not. Any more than wanting to throw darts at a picture of anyone who is promoted for nepotism spawned in any other way is.
/off-topic
I'm a little confused by calling it sexual harassment as well? Nothing was sexual about it? It was harassment, yes, and wop acted like an asshole dickbag and deserved the lulz at his expense... and regardless of if his accusations were true that was still ridiculously stupid/inappropriate. But nothing about it involved "unwelcome sexual advances and/or requests for sexual favors."
/on-topic
Here, have a random headline:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/video-of...er-goes-viral/
hint: the only thing we "know" about any of what you just described is from wop. literally our only source. also, before he was banned wop told me youre a punk ass bitch who likes to stick crayons up your nose. true story.
dude was being extremely unprofessional and it bit him in the ass. serves him goddamn right, and yall are retarded for thinking anything else.
I like that the idea of a woman getting ahead through sex without any evidence elicits more of a reaction from some posters over wop's possible use of his rich birth to procure advantages.
I am jealous of both a rich birth and using sex for advancement. Being an unattractive peasant makes life difficult.
It wasn't Wop's first scandal on here either. There was some shit about a LS bank ages ago.
There were a few incidents with him and LS banks. I don't think they all had a thread. Basically he ran his own LSes for a while and when he got bored he'd buy some shit he wanted and RMT the rest. In fairness, I think a few of the members actually got a cut of the money, but not all of them. His LSes were very active and got a good number of the pops at all hours.
At least I think that's how it went. Been a while.
If you wouldn't be pissed off if he wanted the same thing done for, say, the CEO's son getting promoted because, well, he's the CEO's kid and not because he actually knows what he's doing-- and I suspect a lot of people would not have this level of righteous indignation if that were the case, even if Wop used the exact same terminology for everything else-- then I think that says a lot. From Wop's (unreliable) description, she used sex to engender nepotism.
That said, I do think it was still harassment, and it's definitely the kind of thing that if the boss catches you doing it, you're likely to get fired-- it's unprofessional as hell. I'm not really defending Wop, but just because he behaved like a jerkbag doesn't mean you throw things on him that he doesn't seem to be guilty of. Was Wop a liar? Seems likely. Was Wop unprofessional? Sure. Was Wop harassing her? Yup. Did he deserve to get fired? Probably-- though I strongly think if it had been a dude he did that to instead of a gal, he probably wouldn't have been. Which still speaks to why Wop should have been fired; it was extra dumb, because standing up for women is a pretty strong impulse, and from a business position it just makes sense to not even open that door. His judgment was incredibly poor. And yeah, as soon as he said "Lawsuit" he needed banned. All of that's true.
It just wasn't <i>sexual</i> harassment, and shouting that it was in order to stifle conversation is troubling to me.
Also, my kids scented crayons smell delicious.
Clearly people here have never worked hard only to see less talented or skilled people advance because reasons.
Whether it's sex, legacy, buddyism, or just hatred, blaming a person's ambition is silly. Willful taking advantage of someone with ambition who is stupid enough to be exploited to get ahead is the real issue.
Wop was just too privileged to blame the right parties. Was office skank a bitch? Probably. It's not like a woman can't offer something to an asshole male boss that no one else can. She had pussy to offer, she used it.
So...it's ok to be the office slut because you gotta do you, amirite? I shoulda jumped on this train awhile ago. BRB, sexing up my coworkers.