loool well said
They can ignore you too, but the goal of any representative is usually reelection or "what's best for the ~900,000 people voting for me," not doing "what's best for the country at large."
no. you cant vote the way the money wants you to. you have to vote the way your constituents want or BOOM YOU ARE OUT OF OFFICE. the first rule of politics is get reelected. you have to donate money to a campaign to pay for time. it costs something like 1.7 million dollars to win an election, tv, radio, varius other shit. the average legislator represents over 700k people. thats A LOT of people pulling one person in different directions.
you donate money because the legislator needs it to stay in office, the legislator gives you access to his ear because he does not want that money to run out. if the legislator's community is against what an interest group supports though, they will not vote that way.
And then Senators are the same, but there are fewer of them and they represent a whole state instead so they have more power. Obviously can't please everyone, but you can try and please those with the loudest voices.
I don't think the system was setup for this monetary exchange though. Maybe I'm wrong. If money controls all the way down to the laws then those without money have no say. Just thinking logically here.
Tryven it is a bit frightening that you and I are saying basically the same thing.
all money has a cap though, to keep the playing group level. soft money used to have no cap so interest groups would donate BAJILLIONS of dollars.
Shit makes me sad. I can't help but think founding fathers would be disappointed.
idk, i have never heard of people repeatedly donating 199 dollars but i wouldnt be surprised if it has happened
We have more democracy in youmadness me thinks.
I could spend $10 million to make commercials implying Obama was born in Kenya (not outright saying because that's slander) and as long as I'm not working for or saying I support his opponent, it's fine.