And who are you going to elect that doesn't do that kind of stuff?
And who are you going to elect that doesn't do that kind of stuff?
Yup, liberals did it for years under Mr Chretien.
Before that, Conservatives did it for years under Mulroney.
It's business as usual. When you control the committees and stuff, you get to divert the best projects to your own ridings. Happens in the USA too, look at all the senators who make their resume on the pork they get for their state.
Really? So something like:
Tories used praise for Liberals to defend summit costs: Fraser
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cana...r.html?ref=rss
Is completely par for the course and everyone does it? That's a bullshit answer. The Liberal government was no where near the level of pork that the Tories put through and after the Sponsorship scandal got voted out.
I think the rationale is mostly to use corporate taxes to supplement funding for social programs. It's a delicate balance though. A change to fiscal policy like increasing taxation can stifle investment in an economy, and Canada already has a pretty shameful efficiency gap compared to other Western post-industrial nations. It's an issue I'm personally torn on as a Liberal since I tend to be more of a red tory when it comes to public finances, but am willing to support tax hikes (or at least well-designed taxation systems) to maintain or expand social services.
However, good fiscal policy can incorporate tax breaks and incentives for companies engaging in "socially responsible" business practices, or that support other social goals - ie. green technologies, sustainable energy production, and the like. The Martin Liberals started a number of programs like this and the Harper Conservatives continued and in some cases expanded the system of tax breaks and incentives. However, a poorly thought out corporate tax hike that scares away companies from doing business in Canada is just dumb politics and economics. It's fine to make political promises to reevaluate the corporate taxation system, but let the technocrats public servants and private industry inform the government of what would be best for both sides.
For those that missed the leaders' debate tonight, you can watch the full thing here:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cana...eaders-debate/
I gotta say this 1 on 1 format they used for the beginning of questions is very strange, since instead of debating with each other, the opposition leaders just both agree how much Harper sucks and in what way he sucks.
Why am I watching Ignatieff and Duceppe "debate" each other about crime when they're both agreeing with each other lol. If anything all the 1 on 1s should've been Harper vs someone.
Seriously? Rose coloured glasses because I advocate voting against the most secretive, dishonest Government in Canadian history? Man, BC has a long and storied history of Politicians using office to get rich (See: W.A.C. Bennett) so don't think I'm against Harper because I'm afraid of a little pork.
Edit: For lols http://www.shitharperdid.com
The fact that you think this is the most secretive, dishonest government in Canadian history just proves it. Can't remember Chretien? Mulroney? They all did the same shit. And whoever we elect next will do the same shit as well.
Might as well elect the people with the best policies going forward.
Neither of those muzzled MPs or the media anywhere near the extent of Harper. I can't imagine that Harper would've answered this question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWf2LLaHkM0
The government's job is to run the country, not dance at the news media's every whim.
Refusing to answer questions is not the same as muzzling the media, but thanks for playing.
Anyway, it's clear you just Don't Like Those Conservative Fucks. If you don't want to talk policy, why the hell are you even posting here?
Oh I see, a highly politicized vote finding the government in contempt (because they didn't want to defeat the budget because it would have been a bad strategy considering how most people are content about the economy). That's suddenly way worse than Mulroney accepting kickbacks or the sponsorship scandal or Shawinigate or the million other stupid things the parties in power in the government has done even in just recent history.
I'm sure that will totally change and the government stop doing stupid shit if we turf the current government who is doing a decently reasonable job of navigating the country through pretty rough times and replace them with somebody else.
No, you should vote for whoever you think has the best policy and the ability to carry it out. Since all parties are equally repugnant when it comes to pork and politics-as-usual, that's really the only differentiating factor.
Um, I thought they did defeat the budget and then did the confidence vote.