Even I'm a little surprised with that outcome... Not a single person in that thread with the expected response of "Wtf is wrong with you people?"
I think most sensible people took one look at that title and went "I have no reason to open this thread."
Aye you've got to be pretty twisted to pick an Elin when there are bodacious elf chicks around. o.ob Our initial experience with people playing Elin and all the weirdos that they brought out of the woodwork was what got my LS to drop TERA shortly after we tried the beta.
And aye, echoing all the sentiments above, the official forums are a den of madness. The only reason I began posting there was because I was afraid that the loudmouths would have influence on the Dev Team, and that fear has not abated at all.
I concur that they need to burn the forums wholesale.
A: WTF am I reading?
B: Path notes are up http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...ch-1.22a-Notes
(A. You probably do not want to know. (o.o ) It may well scar your brain forever.
(B. It looks like AF weapons did not make it into 1.22a. Bah. >< I was really excited to see what the PLD sword had statwise.
Yessssssssssssss[dev1415] The query prompt that appears when attempting to leave an airship landing has been revised.
I'm fairly sure SE has abandoned AF weapons and they're just hoping we forget about them.
I have.
lulz, tried to login to "try" the game out again... Members page under maintenance =\
....*shudder*
...the hell?
Ow, my everything.Originally Posted by annabell
Wrong! that's not it!
Don't care about the required amount of points to get to rank 2.
The problem is, the contributions becomes 0 and you don't get rewarded. There isn't any advantage for those who supplied to those who didn't supply anything, There are difference in those who are in ranking and those who aren't. If you're not listed in the ranker it's same as not doing anything at all
Eh? Unless I'm misinterpreting your reply, what they said is true.
Anyone who doesn't make the top 20 would have been better off not contributing at all and it's a massive flaw in the system.
I think the reply was merely pointing out that, while it's still understandable, the translation there sucked really badly.