2010-11 NHL Playoff Thread: HOUSE RULES: ENGAGED

[Ishido]

Now I really wish I could stay in Vancouver through Tuesday night. City is going to be nuts.

[Bregor]

Getting lots of tweets about Caps' top ginger prospect Cody Eakin in Memorial Cup game on NHL-N right now. Fucking pissed I'm stuck at work.

[Thoronas]

Now I really wish I could stay in Vancouver through Tuesday night. City is going to be nuts.

If you don't have to race back for work you should totally stick around. Downtown will be a party if we win. Sucks I'll be doing a 12 hour work day probably

I don't, I want this fucker to go seven games.

Screw you buddy, I want us to actually win the cup this time!

[Thoronas]

Blammo

http://www.gifsoup.com/view6/2536843...n-mcginn-o.gif

[Mote]

Thor, you were absolutely right. I should have gone solo :/


Houston lost in Double OT to Hamilton, 5-4. Going to a game 7, and they're trying to shark the series there too, since they were up 3 games to none... esh

[Bregor]

Haha oh wow:

@Buccigross John Buccigross
During the 2010-11 regular season, the Canucks scored just 1 goal on a 5-on-3 situation, tied with the Oilers for the fewest in the NHL.

[Bweigelt]

While that's hilarious, the Canucks did only have 9 chances 5 on 3 this year for a total of 7 minutes and change which is tied for the lowest amount of chances in the league with Phoenix. They were missing Salo who is a huge part of their 5 on 3 PP for most of those chances as well. By comparison some teams had 20+ chances 5 on 3.

[Ishido]

Lightning fans are pretty cool

[Ace-o-fire]

Beware my drunken math AHHHHH!

SHARKS vs CANUCKS!

Game 1

Canucks = Shots 38, Goals 3 - 12.666 shots per goal.
Sharks = Shots 29, Goals 2 - 14.5 shots per goal.

Game 2

Canucks = Shots 38, Goals: 7 - 5.428 shots per goal.
Sharks = Shots: 31, Goals: 3 - 10.333 shots per goal.

Game 3

Canucks = Shots: 30 , Goals: 3 - 10 shots per goal.
Sharks = Shots: 38, Goals: 4 - 9.5 shots per goal.

Game 4

Canucks = Shots: 13, Goals: 4 - 3.25 shots per goal.
Sharks = Shots: 35, Goals: 2 - 17.5 shots per goal.

Average

Canucks = Shots: 31.344, Goals: 17 - 7.836 shots per goal
Sharks = Shots: 33.25, Goals: 11 - 12.957 shots per goal.

TAMPA vs BOSTON

Game 1

Tampa = Shots: 34, Goals: 5 - 6.8 shots per goal.
Boston = Shots: 33, Goals: 2 - 16.5 shots per goal.

Game 2

Tampa = Shots: 41, Goals: 5 - 8.2 shots per goal.
Boston = Shots: 35, Goals: 6 - 5.833 shots per goal.

Game 3

Tampa = Shots: 31, Goals: 0 - 31 shots per goal. (NA)
Boston = Shots 25, Goals: 2 - 12.5 shots per goal.

Game 4

Tampa = Shots 37, Goals: 5 - 7.4 shots per goal.
Boston = Shots 30, Goals: 3- 10 shots per goal.

Average

Tampa = Shots 35.75 , Goals: 3.75 - 13.35 shots per goal.
Boston = Shots 30.75, Goals: 4.33 - 11.208 shots per goal.

[Thoronas]

The shots per goal in game 2 and 4 for the Canucks is hilarious.

[Bregor]

I've spent the past two nights at work crafting my perennial Capitals offseason rant analysis. I'll probably unleash it between the Conference Finals and Stanley Cup Finals. Spoiler alert: I hate myself and I want to die.

[Flarega]

Oh sharks

[Ace-o-fire]

give me time I'll write one up for every series till the Stanley Cup Finals

edit: Fuck that it's so much my head will explode well come next year I'll be on top of it better.

Instead I'll give ya a super in depth look on the Finals and the Stanley Cup.
Re-did SHARKS vs CANUCKS

Spoiler: show

Game 1
1. Canucks
a. Shots and Goals

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 11, Period 2 = 14, Period 3 = 13]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 – 0, Period 2 = 1, Period 3 = 2]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 – 0%, Period 2 – 7.14%, Period 3 – 15.38%]
iv. [Shots: 38, Goals 3, Shots Per Goal – 7.89%]

b. Penalty

i. [2 Penalties: Period 2 = 1 – Period 3 = 1]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 1 PP goals – 4 PP chances 25% Effective - Time on PP 6:47]

2. Sharks
a. Shots and Goals

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 10, Period 2 = 12, Period 3 = 7]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 – 1, Period 2 = 1, Period 3 = 0]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 – 0%, Period 2 – 0%, Period 3 – 11.76%]
iv. [Shots: 29, Goals 2, Shots Per Goal – 6.89%]

b. Penalty

i. [5 Penalties: Period 1 = 2 Period 2 = 1 Period 3 = 2]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 1 PP goals – 1 PP chances 100% Effective – Time on PP 1:00]

Game 2
1. Canucks
a. Shots & Goals

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 13, Period 2 = 14, Period 3 = 11]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 = 2, Period 2, = 1, Period 3 = 4]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 15.38%, Period 2 = 7.14% Period 3 = 36.36%]
iv. [Shots: 38, Goals 7, Shots Per Goal - 18.42%]

b. Penalty

i. [7 Penalties: Period 1 = 3 - Period 2 = 1 – Period 3 = 3]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 3 PP goals – 6 PP chances 50% effective – Time on PP 9:45]
ii. [5v3 – 0 PP goals – 1 PP chances 0% effective – Time on PP 0:09]

2. Sharks
a. Shots and Goals

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 13, Period 2 = 9, Period 3 = 9]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 = 2, Period 2 = 0, Period 3 = 1]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 15.38%, Period 2 = 0%, Period 3 = 11.11%]
iv. [Shots: 31, Goals 3, Shots Per Goal – 9.67%]

b. Penalty

i. [13 Penalties: Period 1= 2 Period 2 = 2 – Period 3 = 9]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 2 PP goals – 2 PP chances 100.00% Effective – Time on PP 1:53]

Game 3
1. Canucks
a. Shots & Goals

ii. [Shots: Period 1 = 8, Period 2 = 13, Period 3 = 9]
iii. [Goals: Period 1 = 0, Period 2, = 0, Period 3 = 3]
iv. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 0%, Period 2 = 0% Period 3 = 33.33%]
v. [Shots 30, Goals 3, Shots Per Goal – 10%]

b. Penalty

i. [11 Penalties: Period 1 = 2 – Period 2 = 3 – Period 3 = 6]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 2 PP goals - 5 PP chances, 40% effective – Time on PP, 8:23]
ii. [5v3 – 0 PP goals - 2 PP chance, 0% effective - Time on PP, 1:55]

2. Sharks
a. Shots & Goals

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 16, Period 2 = 14, Period 3 = 8]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 = 3, Period 2, = 0, Period 3 = 1]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 18.75%, Period 2 = 0% Period 3 = 12.5%]
iv. [Shots: 38, Goals 4, Shots Per Goal - 10.52%]

b. Penalty

i. [6 Penalties: Period 2 = 4 – Period 3 = 2]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 - 2 PP goals - 9 PP chances 22.22% effective – Time on PP, 14:32]
ii. [5v3 – 1 PP goals - 1 PP chance, 100% effective - Time on PP, 1:19]

Game 4
1. Canucks
a. Shots & Goal.

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 6, Period 2 = 4, Period 3 = 3]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 = 0, Period 2, = 3, Period 3 = 1]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 0%, Period 2 = 75% Period 3 = 33.33%]
iv. [Shots 13, Goals 4, Shots per goal = 30.79%]

b. Penalty.

i. [5 penalties: Period 1 = 4 – Period 2 = 1]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 - 0 PP goal - 2 PP chances, 0% effective - Time on PP, 6:09]
ii. [5v3 - 3 PP goal - 3 PP chances, 100% effective - Time on PP, 0:37]

2. Sharks
a. Shots & Goal.

i. [Shots: Period 1 = 10, Period 2 = 8, Period 3 = 17]
ii. [Goals: Period 1 = 0, Period 2, = 0, Period 3 = 2]
iii. [Shots Per Goal: Period 1 = 0%, Period 2 = 0% Period 3 = 11.76%]
iv. [Shots 35, Goals 2, Shots Per Goal – 5.71%]

b. Penalty

i. [6 penalties: Period 2 = 4 – Period 3 = 2]

c. Power Plays

i. [5v4 – 0 PP goal – 5 PP chance, 0% effective – Time on PP, 10:00]

going to work on averages and Tampa vs Boston later today.

[Thoronas]

lol Puck Daddy has a link to a story about Mike Keenan being a possibility for the coaching job in Dallas. I thought NHL teams had finally learned that he is not a good coach for this era, or any era where he doesn't have Brian Leetch on his team.

[Melena]

Now that i've had time for my rage to simmer, god the sharks pissed me off last night. 0-5 in powerplays in the first 22 minutes, then you basically hand Vancouver over 2 minutes of 5-3 power plays. Take out that horrendous stretch in the second and I felt we played decent. Probably would have won even if we didn't forget how to play for about 7 minutes in the second period. To be honest it's not even a case of Vancouver beating us. It's san jose beating san jose. If Vancouver went up against detroit, I honestly think the wings could have swept them.

[vagus]

If Vancouver went up against detroit, I honestly think the wings could have swept them.

I don't believe that. The 7 game series has taken a toll on the Sharks. I don't doubt it would have taken more of a toll on the Wings. A wings/canucks series would have been closer that's for sure. Also Kesler loves playing @ home. Home being Michigan.

Heatly isn't that great in the playoffs, except that year Ottawa went to the finals. I think he was close to being a point a game that year. However this season he's no where to be seen. Shark fans, do you think he's injured?

[Melena]

If he's injured, he's hiding it well. He's had a few good shots, some close plays, but yea he's pulling a Marleau this year.

[Mote]

love the sig, Thor.

[Valisk]

lol Puck Daddy has a link to a story about Mike Keenan being a possibility for the coaching job in Dallas. I thought NHL teams had finally learned that he is not a good coach for this era, or any era where he doesn't have Brian Leetch on his team.

Do not underestimate our ability to replace one terrible coach with another.

[Palin]

Brian Rafalski annoucning he's retiring at 38 with one year left on his $6 million contract.

Grats Ishido.