Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: BG Orgo Chem     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #1
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    BG Orgo Chem

    Looking over the notes, we didn't haven't covered the mechanism for this and its needed for the lab report.

    Anyone able to assist?

    http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphot..._1940901_n.jpg

  2. #2
    Sandworm Swallows
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,102
    BG Level
    8

    chicken

  3. #3
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,893
    BG Level
    7

    NH3 maybe? lol what section are you doing? I can pull out my ochem book and check

  4. #4
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    Well, we have to actually do the mechanism, to the mystery product will become apparent. I'm just not sure which mechanism to follow, since the only nitrile we've messed with was reacted w/ H2O OH-, H+ instead of NaOH, H+

    But its definitely a nitrile (orgo II by the way). We use his power point notes, so I wouldn't be able to tell you the exact section in any book.

  5. #5
    Cerberus
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    409
    BG Level
    4

    I took this class.
    I passed this class.
    I cheated...

    Wish I could help.

  6. #6
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,893
    BG Level
    7

    It's gotta be something to do with resonance, where you make the N negative and the ring have a +charged carbon. I'm in orgo chem II but it's been a few months since we looked at nitriles :C

  7. #7
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    lol I'm stumped. Wish I could find a nitrile NaOH mechanism, then I'd just follow that, haha.

  8. #8
    E. Body
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,103
    BG Level
    7

    If your lab TAs are anything like mine, you could just ask him/her and they'll do it for you.

  9. #9
    RIDE ARMOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13
    BG Level
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by Cream Soda View Post
    H2O OH-, H+ instead of NaOH, H+
    I... really? Have you not learnt anything on this course?

    (Where do you think the OH- in the first case came from?)

  10. #10
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,893
    BG Level
    7

    Maybe it's just Phenol and NaCN? SN2 reaction with CN as leaving group? lol

    Also NaOH is the same as OH- D:

  11. #11
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Gwathuial View Post
    I... really? Have you not learnt anything on this course?

    (Where do you think the OH- in the first case came from?)
    Well, I was running through the H2O oh-, h+ mechanism the the thing is the OH- part matches up, but then the h20 comes in, which there is none of in the NaOH problem, so it's not the same after that point.

  12. #12
    RIDE ARMOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13
    BG Level
    1

    Anyway, my first guess at a mechanism would just be attack OH- at the C and gradually remove the N bonds, in equilibria all the way.

  13. #13
    Hydra
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    145
    BG Level
    3

    I'm assuming this is in water. Nucleophilic addition of OH to form amide intermediate, then that reacts with H20 and H+ to form NH3 and benzoic acid

  14. #14
    RIDE ARMOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13
    BG Level
    1

    Quote Originally Posted by Cream Soda View Post
    Well, I was running through the H2O oh-, h+ mechanism the the thing is the OH- part matches up, but then the h20 comes in, which there is none of in the NaOH problem, so it's not the same after that point.
    Uh... isn't the H2O the solvent? Or at least any polar proton donating solvent

  15. #15
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    Quote Originally Posted by Gwathuial View Post
    Uh... isn't the H2O the solvent? Or at least any polar proton donating solvent
    Doesn't seem to be the case in the said mechanism. Looking at it in my handout right now, and it's part of the mechanism. Let me see if I can pull it up and post it.

  16. #16
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

  17. #17
    RIDE ARMOR
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    13
    BG Level
    1

    The water in that mechanism is solvent.

  18. #18
    Hackey Thread Lurker since 2010
    I could have bought an 11 pull and have 1000 gems left over, but all I got was this silly title.

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    8,883
    BG Level
    8

    Neucleophilic addition sounds about right. Should all be aqueous. Hydroxide attacks -C(triple bond)N. Mechanism gets fuzzy around that point because it has been 8 years since my last brush in with O-Chem.

  19. #19
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    3,893
    BG Level
    7

    It shows... NH3 on your paper. NaOH is only found in h2o btw, you can't just have pure NaOH as an organic reactant because that's a solid.

  20. #20
    I'm more gentle than I look.
    Mr. Feathers AKA Mr. Striations
    All hail Lord Yamcha

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,538
    BG Level
    9

    Yea, lol my teacher has this Australian accent and I just went to his office and he was like "We didn't use solid NaOH, did weeee?!?!" lol was funny as fuck. I can take it from here. Thanks guys.

Similar Threads

  1. OMG! Someone stole BG's Genbu Strat!!
    By rooster in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2004-11-16, 21:05