Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    finny
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    290
    BG Level
    4

    Debian Headless Server Transfer Speeds

    Hello all,

    Before the Q here's a little background.


    Home File Server Project:
    Converted an extremely old Compaq 7596 I found in my dad's basement into a home file server.

    Specs:
    - DOUBLED the RAM to 256MB!
    - 10/100 Ethernet port
    - SATA controller
    - 30gb IDE hard drive
    - 200gb SATA hard drive
    - Intel Celeron 566mhz

    I left the orig 30gb IDE drive installed to house the OS, and the 200gb is used for storage.

    I have installed and tried out a ton of distros on this junker and finally settled on Debian Squeeze.

    OK then...

    I am currently using NFS file sharing for some backups, but can only get around 11mbps transfer rates no matter what my configuration. I am guessing that it is due to my ancient rig, but not sure if there is anything I should look into.

    Thank you for your time.

  2. #2
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,297
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Trent Reznuh
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    11mbps between that and what other system? what's the surrounding network like? what router or switches are you using?

  3. #3
    BG's most likeable Québécois
    Pens win! Pens Win!!! PENS WIN!!!!!

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    37,887
    BG Level
    10

    Guessing that your network card is static to 10 and not on autonegiotiate

  4. #4
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,297
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Trent Reznuh
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    actually isn't 11mbps decent for a 100mb link?

    and fwiw, here's a paste from a friend's response:
    [04:39pm] <@friend> he said hes running debian on it with nfs
    [04:39pm] <@friend> unless he's in an environment that needs it, tell him to switch to cifs (samba) instead
    [04:39pm] <@friend> cos tweaking nfs for good performance is a pita and beyond the scope of that forum

  5. #5
    finny
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    290
    BG Level
    4

    Quote Originally Posted by rezn0r View Post
    actually isn't 11mbps decent for a 100mb link?

    and fwiw, here's a paste from a friend's response:
    [04:39pm] he said hes running debian on it with nfs
    [04:39pm] unless he's in an environment that needs it, tell him to switch to cifs (samba) instead
    [04:39pm] cos tweaking nfs for good performance is a pita and beyond the scope of that forum
    It has been a pita! The network is all Linux so I figured nfs would be the route to go as I have set up a smb share previously with around 8mbps transfer rate.

  6. #6
    finny
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    290
    BG Level
    4

    Router is a netgear wndr3400, server and client both wired during transfer if it helps.

  7. #7
    Relic Horn
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,411
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Purrrfect Lee
    FFXIV Server
    Hyperion
    FFXI Server
    Cerberus

    11 megabytes/sec is pretty close to capping a 10/100 connection. Needs moar 10/100/1000.

  8. #8
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,297
    BG Level
    6
    FFXIV Character
    Trent Reznuh
    FFXIV Server
    Balmung
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    yeah i was going to say, i thought about 12.5mb was the max, so you're not doing too bad. i could be wrong though. my house is all cat6, which i highly recommend moving to!

  9. #9
    finny
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    290
    BG Level
    4

    I'll double check the read/write tests again tonight, but I was sure it was 11mbits/s and not MB/s.
    I will upgrade to gbit Ethernet once I get a new desktop and convert the current one to the server.

  10. #10
    finny
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    290
    BG Level
    4

    Welp... I got her transferring at about 6-10 MB/s now. Much faster.
    There was a white space issue in my /etc/exports file and tested additional rsize and wsize values.
    Lets consider solved.

    Thanks for your suggestions!