Tbh, I wouldn't mind seeing a Venom+Carnage movie
Spoiler: show
Spiderman movies are aimed at kids it's never going to happen
So, from this scene:
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/198h.../ku-xlarge.jpg
These are apparently all the things on the screen:
Nano Drug System, Weapons System 8A, Venom Storage 7-U, Exoskeleton 232, Plutonium Lab, Research SGOP 520, Transmitter Test 9, Carbon Fiber Test 7, Oscorp Lab 231, Internal System Test 2, Labs 2345 – 4748, Oscorp Tower File 23.
Synthetic plants, Experiment OCT 32A, 67B – Bio-Lab, Eel Lab – Report 29, Ravencroft, Oahu Facility, Document 9303-D, Power Station – NY, OS – Suit (Mark III), London Lab – 0930, Australia Project, Dr Connors File, Dr Morbious File
Bolded the ones that stood out to me.
yeah ok, all in.
Never gonna be in a movie, but I can dream.
![]()
Hollywood is still milking the vampire fascination so Morbius may be possible.
Considering that all Hollywood vampires have to be incredibly attractive, not so much.
Morbius is easily one of the worst characters from Spider-Man. Why can't they just do rubber mask Goblin?
Hollywood would only ruin Morbius
Spoiler: show
![]()
Also if they do add Venom I sure hope it's the brain eating one and not the faggy hero version...
Doesn't Hollywood already have a wonderful habit of ruining characters and prison raping our few good childhood memories.
So from what I have heard... it is being assumed that Rhino is Act 1, Electro is act 2/3, and Goblin is the prologue (leaving him in for #3). That would kind of make sense since based off of the CC footage they showed (which was all Eletro), it is kinda of his origin story at the beginning and he is a a normal guy who idolized Spidy. So there had to be something w/turns him against Spidy aside just becoming Electro. So that could tie into Rhino stuff
fox could make a spin-off called 'big vampire love'
Honestly, I didn't think ASM was all that bad. Will take it over all the Toby movies except for 2. If they just re-did 2 shot for shot with Garfield instead of Toby, I'd be happy. He was the worst Spider-Man. Yes there were some glaring issues with it, but overall it felt much more like how SM should be.
I do feel like they're trying to cover way too much in this second movie. The trailer is VERY busy, makes me worry what is gonna get cut. There was a bunch of footage cut from the first one.
What I am most concerned about though is how is Spider-Man going to handle more than one villain? He gets his ass wupped by Lizard pretty consistently in the first movie. Now you have Goblin, Rhino, and Electro all in one? Then you're gonna have the Sinister 6? Unless they're gonna go the Ultimates route and gonna kill him, which I highly doubt.
Either way, sign me up. Looks good.
he was a worse Spiderman, but he was definitely a better Peter Parker. Garfield didn't feel like a dorky nerd.
Toby made Parker a bitch. Garfield not so much. As spider man, both did fine with there joking.
The bigger discussion should be Dunst playing a shitty Mary J. All hail Emma Stone!
Spider-Man's supposed to be a clever budding scientist- something that the Toby franchise left out completely, instead opting to make him kind of a derp. AMS handled it reasonably well with the inclusion of the webshooters, even if he did somewhat steal the designs from Oscorp.