
Originally Posted by
Pirian
Yes, by the definition of "anonymous" that is the correct assumption. But this is not the case anymore because they've done enough high-profile attacks, as to be recognized as a "unified" group. When it started out then it could very well have been different people all using the same logo, but by using the logo they've united into a Noun called "anonymous" as opposed to the Adjective "anonymous". It is very important to recognize this difference.
By your logic I could say I'm having a tea-party rally next week and then be upset when I get a bunch of misinformed rednecks complaining about government, instead of people who like tea and crumpets. Just because the organization was aptly named doesn't mean that group stays true to the definition of that name.