Well you missed the point see.
They don't want to bear unwanted rapist children themselves. They want to force all other women to have to.
That's a terribly intriguing concept. It shames me (not really) to admit that I'd be interested in seeing it actually happen, but its more about putting any person that preaches about something that they've never had to deal with on the spot and confronting them with it.
Every one of them would react differently
I know most of you probably think this thread has ran its course but I'm gonna keep stoking it so you stay pissed for upcoming ballot issues eventually.
As it stands every Republican presidential candidate except for Mitt Romney and Gary Johnson have signed the 2012 Pro-Life Leadership Pledge.
http://www.sba-list.org/2012pledge
And Personhood amendments will still be going ahead in certain southern and midwestern states like Colorodo and Florida. It is important to note that for Personhood supporters fertilization is apparently a very crucial distinction. Recently Newt Ginrich went ahead to say he thought life begins at implantation not fertilization. For which he got a ton of backlash from the Personhood supporters. So now he took back his comment and changed his stance to say "personhood" begins at fertilization. So make no mistake about their intentions. Yes they do want any contraceptives that impede fertilization to be outlawed.
More than that if an individual life begins at fertilization then any women who have an abortion would be murderers. When speaking to the public most Personhood groups try to handwave this away by saying squishy consolatory things and insisting the law wouldn't actually be carried out in such a way. And that women wouldn't actually be given the death-penalty under murder charges.
That is somewhat true as far as it goes a judge likely would not interpret the law and apply it to that extent. At least for now in the short term. But if "Personhood" became legally entrenched it is true that the ideologically consistent endroad of their logic means things like jail time and even, yes, the death-penalty could apply to women or any "accessories" involved in abortion. That is the full and consistently applies reality of their law and ideas.
But they can speak for themselves:
Olde formula:
1) Kill abortion doctors.
2) ???
3) Go to jail, NO PROPHET!
New and improved formula:
1) Invent wacky law concept.
2) Bribe Acquire votes/support (hot chicks for faster acquiring).
3) Law passes!
4) Get doctors condemned to the death penalty.
5) Legally kill doctors.
6) No go to jail, PROPHET! Hail jeebus!
Srsly, though, the objective obviously isn't to get people condemned for murder, but to use the threat to dissuade people from aborting in the first place; so their "the judge wouldn't apply it" rhethoric doesn't work at all. But they know that.