
Originally Posted by
Yugl
I've maintained that people bitching about politics but never doing anything to fix the situation are at fault for much of the issues we see today. If you consider the decision to "blackout" most of these sites, you'll understand that my point is well supported. With the exception of *possibly* wikipedia, why would blacking out any of these sites be problematic for politicians? If you wanted a blackout to affect politicians, google, facebook, and twitter are required. So who is this really hurting? The citizens most likely to oppose this legislation from the start. How is this effective in preventing legislation? As one person mentioned earlier, this is effective because site-lockdown with the inclusion of zipcode look up semi-forcefully pushes people to take action. In other words, site-lockdown tells lazy people to unlazy-the-fuck-up. In short, if people stopped acting like they're some sort of rebel for opposing politics or actually participated, most of this would have been avoided to begin with. You, if these descriptions apply to you, are responsible for society's problems.