Page 13 of 60 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 15 23 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 1182

Thread: Ron Paul Rises     submit to reddit submit to twitter

  1. #241
    I'm not safe on my island
    Nikkei will still get me.

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    20,043
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by quannum View Post
    interest rates are the passive mechanism that moves money to the rich from the non-rich.
    ?

  2. #242
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,165
    BG Level
    10

    what he means is IF WE CATCH A SALMON ITS A SURPLUS

  3. #243
    Bitchfist
    The horn knows no mercy; only wrath

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,322
    BG Level
    7
    FFXIV Character
    Indalecia Salavachere
    FFXIV Server
    Midgardsormr
    FFXI Server
    Asura

  4. #244
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by archibaldcrane View Post
    lofuckingl

    Yeah, the government can't slash regulations on big businesses, slash taxes on the wealthy, create tons of corporate tax loopholes and slash benefits for working-class people unless it has control of the money supply.

    oh wait those things have nothing to do with each other
    You are mistaken, if the government operated within a strict budget any type of tax favor/benefits would have to be met with immediate tax hikes. Not only is raising taxes a political suicide in most cases, it takes a amazing amount of political will. So the two are very much connected.

  5. #245
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    Inflation doesn't transfer shit to anyone.
    Not technically true.

    If fed loans a bank, say, 10 billion dollars, that money hasn't entered the market yet and therefore has higher purchasing power.

  6. #246
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    Quote Originally Posted by Kuya View Post
    When it comes to free market, neoliberals are more free market than HELs, and libertarians fundamentally (and probably only) care about capitalism, so it's a no brainer who they're siding with. In practice, libertarians are in the republican party, not the democrats. So if anyone in this forum had the idea that libertarians were somehow in the middle between liberals and neoliberals, they should perish the thought. Libertarians are way over on the other side, and nowhere near yours.
    neoliberals are nowhere near anything called "free market". There is nothing free market about using state coercion to dominate local markets, use tax dollars for free infrastructure, use state to restrict competition and use state power to suppress your own employees.

  7. #247
    Spiders are Awesome
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    7,073
    BG Level
    8

    Ooohh, charts. Love me some charts.

    Register to see the NSFW content

  8. #248
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    6,514
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Phoenix

    God damn that shit is so stupid and you post it like every week.

  9. #249
    Pandemonium
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,661
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhinox View Post
    He's a creationist. Sorry cant take a candidate serious if he argues against science.
    Creationism and science are not mutually exclusive. There is of course (as with anything) a group of individuals who go 'lolbigbang' and point to Jesus, but not every Christian ignores the fact that 2 + 2 = 4.

  10. #250
    TIME OUT MOTHERFUCKER

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    4,972
    BG Level
    7

    It's true. A lot of people believe the whole magic guy in the sky concept a bit ridiculous, but feel quite taken in by the social concept of religion. The kind of people who go to church for the conversation and coffee after the ceremonies.

  11. #251
    THOU THOU THOU THOU THOU THOU THOU THOU
    Avatar of Fury.

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    5,584
    BG Level
    8
    FFXIV Character
    Shiroe Blackrose
    FFXIV Server
    Diabolos
    FFXI Server
    Carbuncle

    13 pages, and no one has made the remark that Ron Paul vs Generic Republican Candidate is an 0-10 matchup without Derp Factor?

  12. #252
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,256
    BG Level
    6

    I don't see anything wrong with his religious beliefs as long as he strictly keeps it out of his policies/politics, which he more or less has. The closest I've seen him come to this is saying that he is /personally/ against abortion, but would want it to be left as a state issue rather then a federal one, which is consistent with his entire ideology. e.g. He' also /personally/ for nuclear power, but has said he wouldn't support it federally.

    Are there any better examples?

  13. #253
    BG Medical's Student of Medicine
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    34,715
    BG Level
    10

    Did I miss the talk about the debate? I find it odd nobody is discussing it.

  14. #254
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,903
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Shiva
    WoW Realm
    Cho'gall

    I turned it off once Romney started talking about increasing the military.

  15. #255
    Pandemonium
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,661
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Sylph

    I'm so conversative that most republicans make me rage, but I find it funny that republicans think they have a chance of winning this election. Obama is going to win because of the black vote - the same black vote that was galvanized in 2008, but failed to materialize at the polls in 2010 (incumbent always looses ground in the house/senate, etc etc).

    And don't take that as a racist comment, I think the enduring legacy of Obama won't be a bailout or obamacare, but the fact that his excellent speeches and black skin tone helped bring a demographic of voters to the polls that were disinterested and non-participatory before his campaign (blacks and voters under 30).

    The only republican that can win this election isn't running, and no, I don't know who that might be, they are all going to lose.

  16. #256
    Banned.

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    6,903
    BG Level
    8
    FFXI Server
    Shiva
    WoW Realm
    Cho'gall

    I think Ron Paul is the only one that has a chance against Obama. But it could also be a landslide for Obama vs Paul, lol. I just think he's so different from the rest of the field that we won't really know if he'll be accepted in or outright rejected if he gets to the final dance. He isn't Obama, so he gets that vote, and his "I'm not the politician everyone else is and I have the record to prove it." can really fuck up the "Change you can believe in." speech because Paul has a far better track record when it comes to all that.

    I think despite the polls Obama will beat any "just another Republican" but Paul isn't, and we won't know if he can get accepted by the media/population if he's given the chance vs a president people are largely unhappy with.

  17. #257
    Bagel
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,256
    BG Level
    6

    Comment on race / black vote is retarded but I cbf'd arguing with it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eaglestrike View Post
    I think Ron Paul is the only one that has a chance against Obama. But it could also be a landslide for Obama vs Paul, lol. I just think he's so different from the rest of the field that we won't really know if he'll be accepted in or outright rejected if he gets to the final dance. He isn't Obama, so he gets that vote, and his "I'm not the politician everyone else is and I have the record to prove it." can really fuck up the "Change you can believe in." speech because Paul has a far better track record when it comes to all that.

    I think despite the polls Obama will beat any "just another Republican" but Paul isn't, and we won't know if he can get accepted by the media/population if he's given the chance vs a president people are largely unhappy with.
    Mitt Romney wouldn't have a bad chance against Obama really, he's been pretty good at the debates so far. Republicans would vote for him purely to defeat Obama, and with his romneycare background some liberals might even switch over, given the disappointment with Obama's profound weakness through his whole term. Plus he has the face of a president Newt would lose, he's just so inherently unlikable.

    Ron Paul would be best by far, but I have the feeling that even if he does win the nomination by some miracle, Newt or one of the other low-moral candidates might run independently just to split the vote and give Obama the election, I'm sure corporate America would happily compensate him for the trouble. ~_~

  18. #258
    Ridill
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    22,165
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by Buffy View Post
    I'm so conversative that most republicans make me rage, but I find it funny that republicans think they have a chance of winning this election. Obama is going to win because of the black vote - the same black vote that was galvanized in 2008, but failed to materialize at the polls in 2010 (incumbent always looses ground in the house/senate, etc etc).

    And don't take that as a racist comment, I think the enduring legacy of Obama won't be a bailout or obamacare, but the fact that his excellent speeches and black skin tone helped bring a demographic of voters to the polls that were disinterested and non-participatory before his campaign (blacks and voters under 30).

    The only republican that can win this election isn't running, and no, I don't know who that might be, they are all going to lose.
    I'm guessing you have a good relationship with the blacks.

  19. #259
    Relic Shield
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,695
    BG Level
    6

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz View Post
    neoliberals are nowhere near anything called "free market". There is nothing free market about using state coercion to dominate local markets, use tax dollars for free infrastructure, use state to restrict competition and use state power to suppress your own employees.
    I don't think you know what neoliberalism means.

  20. #260
    I'll change yer fuckin rate you derivative piece of shit
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    58,767
    BG Level
    10

    Quote Originally Posted by guartz View Post
    You are mistaken, if the government operated within a strict budget any type of tax favor/benefits would have to be met with immediate tax hikes. Not only is raising taxes a political suicide in most cases, it takes a amazing amount of political will. So the two are very much connected.
    Or they could slash taxes on the wealthy/create corporate tax loopholes whilst slashing benefits for the middle/lower classes (which is exactly what I fucking said), maintaining their balanced budget and doing exactly what they want on both ends.

Page 13 of 60 FirstFirst ... 3 11 12 13 14 15 23 ... LastLast