Um, the fines are unjust if they are handed out to the wrong person. Nothing's changed, my argument is consistent. You just don't want face cameras because you are cheap and like to speed, apparently.
this is so fucking stupid lol.
you win archi, I don't care enough. You aren't getting your way though
I was asked a question, man you're really reaching now
you could prove that you were not the person who parked the car in some cases very similar to how you could prove you were not the one speeding with the cameras (i.e. hiking in fucking China) but we've all agreed that neither would be acceptable defenses to most courts
Tweek just stop while you're not ahead lol, it's getting really sad now.
Nah, when you're right, you're more like a hero.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S 4G using Tapatalk
an hero has emerged victorious
I don't think archi would even have a problem with the cameras now if it wasn't for the story of the judge pretty much saying "Too bad, so sad" when people showed up to court to contest the ticket. It seems every one else conveniently forgets this when defending the cameras. Is every judge going to be ridiculous as that one? No, but the fact that it could happen is in itself pretty ridiculous.
If I was a judge and the defendant just said "It wasn't me", I'd want to know who it was then. If the response is anything like what Archi suggests of "It's not my job to tell you that, that is what the cops should be doing" you better believe I'd go through with the ticket. (And I'd tell him to stop being a dumbass about loaning out his car and/or start locking it so random guys stop jacking it just to get him caught on camera)