Foreskin: The Exhaustive Roundtable

[Ksandra]

The American Academy of Pediatrics no longer recommends circumcisions.

"Where We Stand: Circumcision

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) believes that circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages, as well as risks. The existing scientific evidence is not sufficient to recommend routine circumcision. Therefore, because the procedure is not essential to a child’s current well-being, we recommend that the decision to circumcise is one best made by parents in consultation with their pediatrician, taking into account what is in the best interests of the child, including medical, religious, cultural, and ethnic traditions."

yet they even state it has potential medical benefits and advantages. Basically they are stating it could go either way so while they don't recommend it they aren't against it and feel it's strongly a parent's choice.

As men age there's greater sensation loss and keratinization and they have to thrust faster and harder just to feel anything, which makes for unpleasurable sex for women.

wut

There's plenty of info out of the net with women giving their accounts of sex with an intact man verses a circumcised one, with circumcised sex being unfavorable. Women report a greater frequency and ease of orgasm with intact men.

There are studies on both ends of the spectrum enough to say "shit is inconclusive"

Ie:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_...s_and_response

Cortés-González et al. studied 19 female partners of men scheduled for circumcision. They reported a significant reduction in vaginal lubrication following circumcision, from 78% to 63%, but found no statistically significant differences in "general sexual satisfaction, pain during vaginal penetration, desire, [or] vaginal orgasm".[39]

Kigozi et al. reported on a prospective study of 455 female partners of men circumcised as part of a randomised trial. 39.8% reported improved sexual satisfaction following circumcision, 57.3% reported no change, and 2.9% reported reduced sexual satisfaction after their partners were circumcised.[40]

Williamson et al. (1988) studied randomly selected young mothers in Iowa, where most men are circumcised, and found that 76% would prefer a circumcised penis for achieving sexual arousal through viewing it.[41] Wildman and Wildman (1976) surveyed 55 young women in Georgia, US, reporting that 47 (89%) of respondents preferred the circumcised penis (the remainder preferred the uncircumcised penis).[42] Bailey et al. report that there is a preference by women for circumcised men, mentioning that the circumcised penis enters a woman more easily and is less likely to cause injury to the vagina.[43][verification needed]

Frisch et al. (2011) studied participants in a Danish national health survey, and found that male circumcision was associated "with a range of frequent sexual difficulties in women, notably orgasm difficulties, dyspareunia and a sense of incomplete sexual needs fulfilment."[33]

Basically, some say it does some say it doesn't. Take surveys with a grain of salt always. If you go to the wiki page it actually lists the major studies and it seems like the majority state that in the end it doesn't make any difference.

[Deejay]

Yes, clearly this is a valid parallel because only some people have to learn how to walk since they didn't get their legs cut off at birth.

Yes, and cutting off a part of your body is clearly the proper response to circumvent learning how to use an appendage.

edit: and i'm not even against circumcision. both have their positives and their negatives. i just think it's dumb to argue either way like its the end all be all

[Bregor]

i just think it's dumb to argue either way like its the end all be all

Welcome to BG.

[NynJa]

ITT: Bottoms who actually dont like bottoming and prefer their man cum fast and get it over with and get back to cuddling.

http://files.sharenator.com/joker11_...138013-580.jpg

[Charismatic]

i just think it's dumb to argue either way like its the end all be all

No you don't. You clearly love to argue it since you started trying to argue with a nigga over a statement that was pretty obviously not serious.
I'm just making it happen for you.

[solanis]

lol @ where this thread went, if it was moved here to prevent personal attacks that sure didn't happen

[Charismatic]

It was moved because it isn't sports.

[Kuya]

So is the politics section the new spam forum or something? What i'm getting is that mods make shit threads, and when shit thread is shit, they dump it into the politics section.

Otherwise, i don't get it.

[Deejay]

No you don't. You clearly love to argue it since you started trying to argue with a nigga over a statement .

Argue what? How dumb you sound? Yeah, I'll do that all day.

Listen, I'm not adverse to you making jokes. The anteater comment you made earlier was quite funny. That comment you made just now was retarded so I said something.

[Charismatic]

Yeah, its retarded when you take it seriously... which you're doing.
You shouldn't be.

Now that you know its a joke you can just say 'my bad, I didn't know you were kidding' and wash your hands of this, or you can continue and I'll just be the only one laughing. Up to you.

[Deejay]

cute save face. you may have been joking, but you left it up to interpretation. a lot of people here are going to read that and just use it a fuel for whatever backwards ass reasoning they already have.

but it's all love bro, i ain't mad

[Charismatic]

Saving face for what..? C'mon dawg, you gotta do better than that if you're gonna try to go down this road.
I do at the very least expect better.

Open for interpretation if you have absolutely no sense of humor maybe.

[Deejay]

lol. listen i'll bow out. this is dumber than the main argument which is fucking saying something

[SephYuyX]

So is the politics section the new spam forum or something? What i'm getting is that mods make shit threads, and when shit thread is shit, they dump it into the politics section.

Otherwise, i don't get it.

Politics = Shit, so that makes sense.

[ronin sparthos]

ITT: Cut penis which is a relatively new ritual in the human existence trumps uncut penis which worked pretty well for thousands of years.

[Caiyuo]

I don't know that anteater shit was p. horrifying, kind of a rock-solid argument

[NynJa]

ITT: Cut penis which is a relatively new ritual in the human existence trumps uncut penis which worked pretty well for thousands of years.

Average age of natural death thousands of years ago: maybe 40?
Average age of naural death now: around 80

Ignoring the changes to medicine, living styles etc etc: circumcision clearly makes you live longer.

[Rhinox]

DJ does it bug you that white people speak Ebonics to you when they ordinarily wouldn't?

Would bug the hell outtova nigga like me.

[ronin sparthos]

Average age of natural death thousands of years ago: maybe 40?
Average age of naural death now: around 80

Ignoring the changes to medicine, living styles etc etc: circumcision clearly makes you live longer.

Way to miss the point?

A cut penis does nothing significant for you compared to an uncut penis which men used throughout history for reproductive purposes. The idea that circumcision does something for men largely rests on religious superstition and junk science.

If something was significantly wrong with the uncut penis, we wouldn't be here today having this oh so wonderful debate on genital mutilation.

[Drex]

So is the politics section the new spam forum or something? What i'm getting is that mods make shit threads, and when shit thread is shit, they dump it into the politics section.

Otherwise, i don't get it.

couldn't tell from the subforum title?